Don't blame King Charles for what you refuse to do. Which is getting me in the channel.

Don't you have the same motive?

 

Unlike Trudeau, there are no exploitation factors with King Charles. The Royal family.

I don't think it was about money, not entirely. Not in a forceful way.

But rather, I myself was valued as an asset, hence the protection.

 

Of course when there is prominent exploitation factors, like trying to subjugate me and take my earnings in entirety, that would be felony. But nothing like that exists.

 

And if I had gotten in there earlier. To think about it...

What if, I saw their writings and then defended myself?

Would you know then if I was 'echoing' their words as a follow up or genuinely from myself?

 

So my isolation and speak helps prove these factors at least in the now.

 

(When I get in there, don't show me their writings.

Until all is resolved.

Understand that I cannot be the one framing ANYONE.

And you really underestimate the human factors of it all.

 

When that already gives you the answers.

I do not have the hindsight of their past with whichever records,

nor the foresight of their future they would yell out as memory.

I cannot risk these factors.

And must confess if I did something wrong.

All I know is that I am innocent.

And that is how I am able to know whatever they say can only be a lie.)

 

 

When it was too late to get me in the channel,

the evil that you must differentiate is whether I am genuinely being protected,

or being attempted control and exploited, as has done with Trudeau and Canada.

 

There is the difference in criminality.