If you think that misdirecting logic or the law and confusing the mass to alleviate and incriminate attackers to victims, in a flip. But especially as you use this situation where I am blind, to your advantage and won't admit it. Stating it's a "test" towards my abilities and character, when like I mentioned before, it is but another try and attempt. See if it sticks.

You will be charged for that the moment I get in there and interpret whats transpired.

Some of my speculations are as follows in this type of deceit:

You people misleading a blind guy of the events and charging him for intent, intent of which is based on your chosen charges and punishment, which is capital, and I am following through on it.
Is victim-blaming.

Whatever Elon is misleading on a contractual obligation, again, to a blind person who was gaslit, and framed. If such a thing existed, there wouldn't be a need to frame, nor does framing uphold that agreement. (If something like that is going on)

There are numerous speculations. But the point is this. YOU are willing susceptible instead refuting it, because your sole purpose is to save the attackers no matter what. This may include King Charles. (I apologize if not)  (*I mean King Charles is trying to save my attackers. There is no honor in that. You are only exposing me to dangers and abuse because of your benevolence, and that can only be interpreted as arrogance. I see "my son is so dumb" so I probably got this wrong. However if what I say applies to another, you know who you are.)

 

You are obligated for fair assessment, and stop antagonizing the blind person. Or manipulating the situation to his disadvantage. The law is not a game, and you will be charged for attempted manipulation of the court.

You folks be fair on this. Thwart out any type of unreasonable control. You do not perspective reassign a crime. A crime is a crime.

 

Victory "300".

Like I told you.

When there is crimes that aimed to harm the partner in partnership, using that very merit of trade.

By framing.

There is no contest to uphold honor and dismantling the lethal intent of crime with money.

The crime must be addressed.

And this is reassigning perspective to Elon Musk's advantage.

As if the dangers of his framing, obliterating my life one way or another, doesn't exist.

This is the evil of this court.

You think by dismantling his criminal intent, and acting as if he must simply uphold the contest makes things right?

 

First is that my ideas FAR exceeds merit of 300B.

By shares I would be making this guy richer than ever before.

Secondly, this exchange only existed because of HONOR.

I permitted it believing this person's good will.

But it was a thief, a lethal one that frames and aims for destruction of its partner.

There is no business in this.

It is a crime scene.

And you people trying to reassign that, OBVIOUS FACT.

That is CRIME ITSELF.

And as I have iterated this before, you repeat yourselves again.

Do you know what karma is?

You abuse me and exploit your power to the point of oblivion.

"Take a look at this sacred heart, before it blows up"  Song lyrics XD

Exactly what will happen.

 

You are making me into a slave before the evil.

I will fucking wipe you all out.

Be fair. This is no law.

This is exploitation.

 

Elon Musk is charged.

 

"They don't really care about us." -Michael Jackson's song.

I know.

But where there is exploitation of power.

If there is any discernment of the law,

they will be addressed.

 

 

 

-----------

"Kyle's mom is a fucking bitch"

Yeah... I think I called Patrick's mom a bitch. And So did I to Mike's mom.

But not directly at them of course, behind their backs.

I don't know if I did not in public, probably just in my home.

There are many variants of 'bitch' in Korean, but I am seeing "ssangnyun" in Korean words relay with South Park for some reason.

No, I don't use that word. Nor at that age, I was capable of that.

More like "나쁜년" or years progressed, long after they were gone from my life, "개같은 년" is a possibility but never "썅년" that is something my sister would use it sounds like.

So why I would say that.

Because in a sleep over, when we were 11, to Patrick's home. With my friends.

She told me to bring my own pillow. While others did not have to.

Passive insinuation that I am tardy. (Of which I must have been)

In that discrimination, I was hurt I believe.

For Mike's mom, as we played Tetris, her ego got in the way of complimenting me,

and said "you do it so slowly but well" insinuating my speed of thought was slow, but sure.

So little things.

But guys, you don't front that.

There's always a give and take ey?

Anyway, it's a long time ago. Apologies for my attitude at the time. :P

 

 

So if I was iterating that even years after they were gone from my life.

It is probably a psychological issue in retrospect.

More of a meditative thing where I can declaring a severance from past.

Thinking that is strength. Not even personal.

So there were subliminal meta factors at what I say.

And to that, I would say one has gone crazy in his lonesome. XD

Don't take it to heart guys. It is a long gone thing.

 

I see that your mothers were one that of love, despite the hurtful statements.

The environment itself is letting us be friends and within it, playful taunting.

 

 

If Patrick and Mike is still in trouble, and Darek as well. (To that kind of making fun of his mother's welfare status, of which I didn't know welfare was exactly and kinda knew he needed money, I was being insensitive) I apologized years later in a chat.

I believe that... After Patrick said sorry to our meeting in our early twenties, things didn't go well. When I was given the death penalty by Biden I believe and everyone thought I was dead.

I believe that... because of King Charles' protection, they didn't believe in the urgency of harm towards my mortality. But at the worst, being buried alive or something like that. Keeping me in a zero state. So while it was cruel, they justified this with whatever reasoning like, the girls. In their jealousy. Discarding the right and wrong in it...

So does that deserve a penalty?

Not the death penalty. Some fraud perhaps. But not capital punishment.

They are not bad people, they were more the followers of the flock. Not frontrunners.

We must differentiate this.

I say this, at the risk of knowing that, one lessened punishment can be used to alleviate my attackers, the frontrunners, in some twisted reasoning.

But please do not. That is exploitation.

Where people in higher status had the control, the beginning and the end, they also have the power to influence the mass,

and credibility towards the law. It is when they initiate the harm, even the law itself looks the other way. Like the police and authorities then as they framed me.

Zuckerberg could have saved me instantly in defense.

It is entirely Elon's intent that harm manifests and proceeds.

And Biden supporting this in unity and targeting my life to devour by lethal attacks.

 

Frontrunners are different of course.

And the rest should be treated with more lenience.

 

 

 

So I saw a relay Adam asking for my help. "Brethen" relay on his shares.

Adam. While you may believe that I am in control of your fate by my defense or offense.

I am not.

I can certainly try to help you. As you have helped me.

And the best I can do is trying to alleviate you from the capital punishment because you may not pose more danger in my life.

But several factors from the authorities must be present as well.

1. That you may have held back in helping me against their framing. Which adds to then your deliberate negligence as you have done so in the beginning and that is why I am here.

2. That you contest your hijacking and following up to my ideas in persistence still, unaware that by the law, this will only work against you as pursuit of harm.

So you have to drop your ego in totality Adam.

It is something in you that partly, still sees it as a game that can be controlled by your merit,

the law will interpret this as pursuit of danger. Both in your iteration of refuting your wrong, as Zuckerberg has, fronting the girls to justify my destruction perhaps.

These things are all announcement of your criminality after the fact.

So when you drop all these, and the law sees that you are no longer harm. Then they may help you out of capital punishment. But not alleviation man.

That is what I hope for you as well, despite the fact that you are one of the major causes of my suffering.

So yeah, I am trying to help.

There are people who are endless danger. Like Elon, Biden, Steve.

But you shouldn't be one of them.

 

 

So I am seeing "Steve" is deliberately set in blindness as well.

Do you really think once he has seen the channel, and with his friends,

that he won't be relayed the information?

That is called your deliberately trying to alleviate him by falsifying an disadvantage.

Where this person has every intent of repeating offense in the lowest of ways.

So if my speculation on his blindess is correct,

watch for exploitation by the law.

 

 

Steve must be charged for all that he has done on my life authorities.

It has toyed with my life with endless deceit and gaslighting.

It has recruited acolytes and targeted my life raising the mass to be affected by him by slander, defamation, character assassination.

It uses baseless accusations and tries to destroy me leveraging on the intent of the powerful,

knowing that they are trying to destroy me as well.

It must be charged. Or the cycle will continue.

 

 

Setting him blind most likely has revealed his intent clearly.

But it can also be used as a weapon against me, if you do not know the whereabouts of his connection and cannot prove it on a flip end.

But I trust that the law will be fair on this.

Steve will always only be a follow up.

And follow up, is intended pursuit of destruction.

 

 

 

When they have no ability to drop their ego and pushes on with deceitful control.

Unless the law becomes willing susceptible to their fraudulent attempts after the fact of repeating offense,

unless the law has its own ego intertwined with them with the same ultimate goal of antagonizing me, the victim.

 

This court is long adjourned.

They are all guilty.

And the outcome of their punishment is decided on whether they are pursuit of harm or not.

That is the difference between capital and incarceration.

And I am only speaking from your set rules.

 

 

(pasting this again in case elon hijacked my messages)

hmm.. just to finalize my mining machine,

have you all seen way log cabins are built?

you chop away a segment of it from near to the end of the logs,

to place it on top of each other without leaving a gap.

and when you do that, they use a chainsaw to first  leave many lines of indentation,

and then use an axe to chop away the protruding portions.

This makes things much more convenient.

Likewise, the side to side horizontol drill can go in and out, making indentations as it moves up.

And then once it reaches a portion where it needs to descend,

the drill can position itself angularly like this line here     \

which is facing downward and spinning, and eat away at the protruding portions.

It will make the cuts more predictable, and with far less resistence this way.

 

 

Do not hate me for my brilliance and clarity of thought, as my mind continuously finds better solutions. hahaha

Alright. Understand that I mean well to the States,

so as long as you are not trying to fuck me over.

But even as I help, I am ostricized and destroyed by their efforts.

 

That relay. Yes, if all that is true about my genetics. I go with Cartman's stance. XD

 

 

Okay I am going to start off this morning with purchase of some food.

Which is going to be the last of my spending for this month.

I keep getting sick going to soup kitchens because people there often have the flu.

But no choice...

I can only spend so much monthly...

 

What a pathetic existence I have.

However, things will get better.

 

Hopefully you folks will help,

but I am saying even without, it will get better...

But don't wait and see.

This is slavery.

And monitoring my life for your gain.

 

 

It is disturbing that relay.

If I understood the avatars correctly.

Loki is relayed as Wogi.

while the female variant of that Loki is myself. XD

and that Kang character was Victor.

Victor is entirely LYING.

Whatever  he asserted, if he is trying to steal the origins of my idea.

He adapted. Why would he be silent until that moment when I mentioned his games as part of inspiration? Not really, it was part of my thoughts after what Adam triggered from his relays I believe.

Nothing in those years had Victor asserted an idea. Nor would I remember only to use it now.

The presentation itself must prove that it has nothing to do with him, by its merit.

I also seen the video gaming console relay that victor had.

It was an variation of SNES that went into a floppy disk to back up the roms.

And he had many games. He can try changing perspective and making up whatever he wants.

But where there is no actual evidence but words,

and where he was involved in fraudulent activity in conspiracy.

The intent is repeating and clear.

He must be charged.

 

At 11-12, one is not capable of intellectual discussion. And he is entirely lying.

 

 

We are all the fucking way Victor.

You set out to frame me, you were trying to kill me.

I'm hunting you down.

 

You fucking cunt. You have no fucking clue what I am.

You are a dead man.

 

He needs to be charged.

That is end of story.

See the timeline in which the fucker was silent all that time,

until to the moment of my generous 'inspiration' mention from David's home.

He has seen the presentation before that.

The silence itself is admission by default.

And what he has done is a follow up.

Taking an opportunistic stance.

Whatever he is saying, he lies, in creation of doubt,

and like Steve, is leveraging on the proximity of physical acquaintance.

Nothing more.

I hardly remember any conversations we had.

What I do know is that no conversations of intellectual merit was present.

Watching porn and playing games. Only few times I went to his house.

This fucker must be charged.

 

 

I don't care if Victor is one of my childhood friends in the neighbourhood.

If the fucker turned evil. He must be charged for.

I wouldn't of course, even mention an 'inspiration' factor, if it was remotely his.

That would create complications.

The fucker was opportunistic and taking that as a flip, an invitation for framing.

It was being predatory.

This fucker must be charged.

Understand that I am not heartless.

I would protect my childhood friends no matter what.

But this isn't it.

This fucker was framing and he must be charged for.

 

He has had plenty chances to confess.

But where it keeps on creating doubt,

where there cannot be actual evidence,

but correlating its own life.

This fucker must be charged.

 

 

Indirect framing as has Patrick and Mike and Darek, perhaps, can be forgiven as followers of flock.

It is criminal negligence. Minor charges.

DIRECT framing by its initiation AND alongside the indirect framing and whichever conspiracy factors that is present by Victor is repeating pursuit of harm.

This must be accounted for. He must be charged. It spells clear intent. Where he is violating the law by criminality.

 

 

No. that homelander relay stating my 'arrogance' infuriated him.

no. i was trying my best to survive through their attacks,

based on the obvious events that has transpired.

while helping the States and Elon Musk himself through generation of my ideas.

What Elon Musk did was trying to 'rig the election' towards the advantages of my attackers no  matter what.

this is because he began seeing me as a competitive threat, as well as to protect my attackers by making me into a fool.

The list of abuse this fucker applied on my life was endless. Completely aware that nothing is fair for me,

taken my sight. where i needed help, he exploited my vulnerability. he exploited the situation and endangered me endlessly.

He must be charged for.

 

 

guys, Patrick, Mike. at those ages, Victor wasn't even remotely close to whatever fraud he is stating. we would understand the flow of what he would be if otherwise. there were no intellectual merit and he knows it. if he is framing, kindly help against it.