As for Adam and Mark.

I don't know how many times I must say this. Wow.

And how they misdirect things.

I get that they help. Stopped pursuit of attacks. Good.

I will help them as well then.

But that is alleviation from capital punishment.

NOT  alleviation from entirety of what they did.

 

I am seeing earlier "What'ya want from me." -Adam

And also "We need to talk about Kevin." - in a scene where he misleads and a child when child needs a glass eye, (due to his neglect) and the parents are saying he doesn't have to feel blamed, and he callously says, that's what happens to kids and goes on eating a rambuten whatever that eye-looking fruit. And the mother yells at him you were suppose to look over the child. (This callous attitude is what Adam is, and to an extent, Mark as well)
(It was toying with my life in a type of mischief at the time, helping Anna)
But the real incrimination point, is what happened afterwards in exploitation and framing that followed thereafter that control. These two events work hand-in-hand.

 

Charges. Serving time. This is a must. For both of them.

But I ask for alleviation from capital punishment.

 

When you turn a criminal court into a zero-sum game of sort.

That you may try to create a 'bubble' in which the perpetrators are either incriminated or not.

Instead an appropriate punishment, pushing for ultimatum to all (that is the capital punishment)

and blaming that on me. That I have to be the sacrifice in comparison to their punishment.

Is deliberate intent to create a bubble that would pop.

So I kind of feel that the court is constantly pushing for a type of bubble.

I apologize if my speculation is wrong.

It is just that, how do they go 'free' from the entirety when they should at least be serving time?

Why is it a constant, lopsiding to "death or go free" ?

It means the intent is to either create a bubble that burst, in massivity of incrimination,

or individually, you want to let people go instead giving them ANY sentencing.

Again I apologize if my speculation is wrong.

But that should not be.

 

Steve using the word "fragile" LOL

It was a misusage of word in translation to Korean as well in my mind I believe.

 In thoughts of my ear. Which is indeed fragile.

At the slightest of door banging.

But to use that wrong word usage, (I tend to use stupid words without thinking about implications of it. I don't even talk that much socially. Or hardly at all. For many  years.
So talking itself was something difficult to force out. So usage of correct wording is --- sometimes weird. Like stating "sonic boom" XD as a way to describe the door banging.)

The thing about this fucker is that - it's INTENT to label me a certain way,

in its demented way ----

is beyond any wording.

Please understand.

 

-------

As for the "Jonathan Mofatt" the person who keeps calling me a "smooth criminal"

I think that was an authority. One the authorities.

Again. I believe this person's intent is to label me that way.

He is deliberately missing out the impossibility of that "smooth criminal".

I am not in control. Over ANYTHING.

It is entirely by their own choice.

 

Whether that is Anna, or Steve, or anyone ----

they hold the control over my life.

 

So when this person keeps on saying this. This is to create a deliberate bias,

or if using that as a defense towards them, this is propaganda.

Again apologies if no such thing is going on.

 

"Sting" with "Stevie wonder" "Fragile"

is this fucker trying to label me as a gay guy or something like that?

"Sting"?

Charge for defamation.

What the fuck.

Apologies if that is not the actual person "Sting" the singer.

Fragile? Me?

I am far from it.

A little mad/crazy due to the situation, but no.

This is Steve's INTENT to label me that way. Despite my statement.

 

Why the fuck would you intervene in this? if you are.

who the fuck is this guy?

 

The filth is in some of the people here, trying to create a propaganda.

Trying to justify actions of creating devastation by character assassination,

when that is not the topic.

And that fucked up evil. That must be accounted for.

 

It's a way to play with words. Image.

When what Steve done, with its brother, and what followed thereafter.

Was a hate crime, proceeding into confirmation of that hate crime by confirming its prejudice.

NOT about finding a 'truth' to who I am. Do you understand that? (1)

And if it was to end with an ambiguity at last, years later. Stating "he is not gay but I don't know what he is."

Then why go on pursuit of that for years? In the first place?

without conclusive evidence but its own prejudice? despite my statement?  

IF NOT WITHOUT THE INTENT OF HARASSMENT AND DEFAMATION IN THE MASS? (2)

 

So these idiots are trying to misdirect things with words.

But it doesn't work that way. What is done is done and working from that.

Steve the fucker, is an diabolical fucking cunt. Trying to toy with my life.

And attempting murder by proxy by framing. In VARIOUS framing.

Hate crimes and attmpted murder is for capital punishment.

 

 

 

 

 

Ok. First. He knew my situation needed help. As I asked for help.

That the police won't believe unless I have evidence.

HE IS THE CEO.

With the "be respectful" policy.

He HELD the key as administrator of his servers, that Anna was in interaction with myself.

The conversations between Anna and I. By reciprocation. Through the relays.

And further, TOWARDS HIM, ADAM. From myself to Adam.

AS he is directly seeing that CHANNEL.

Of which he can INSTANTLY FUCKING RELAY to the police OR MYSELF.

Yes I said, he need not help after he wasn't GIVING HELP in my defeat.

That was after like a week after asking him for help on the police.

Before or after I said he need not help,  

It doesn't matter what I said. He had every chance to correct it thereafter or before.

He was responsible for his actions as a citizen. He callously looked away.

AS THE CEO OF QUORA WHERE INTERACTION WAS HELD.

Why is that so hard to grasp?

This is deliberate criminal negligence. But unknowing as to what would happen next.

How it will grow. But that's not that highest incrimination point.

The real incrimination is what FOLLOWED.

I don't need to say anything about the presentation framing fronting Biden.

Ok? I don't know what they said, but that is beyond anything redeemable.

THEY SHOULD HAVE SPOKE OUT.

These two in conjunction with each other, proves attempt to control.

And isolating me to that effect of control and harm for their benefit.

 

 

Back from controller sell.

 

 Can't remember clearly but I think it was "빈약하다" in Korean I was thinking of that translated to the word. Or in a different context.

Whichever way, what is important is that the fucker is showing predatory behavior
to use its prejudice on to me, beginning with its brother. Fronting violence to subjugate.

And if thinking strictly in that context of defamation. It is there to HUMILIATE the person in public, when it is unnecessary. Think of all the things it has said on to me. An opinion is once or twice, it is retracted as soon as the person states who he is. But the fucker is persisting to years and years, daily. In its insane vanity.

Something is wrong with this fucker. It is boiling in malice. Latching on to my life and attacking it endlessly.

It's not about the defamation itself. It is about misusage of it. Asserting an identity,
and exploiting that said identity by fronting violence, targeting it, is both a hate crime. And it has only amplified since then. And it goes on.

 

 

So the authorities must be able to look through all that, and simply do not dismiss it as an opinion or entertainment. Quite a fucking devotion to assassinate by installation of an image, dehumanize, slander (even asserting gay sex I believe, from Mr Robert Workman's relay long ago) it just toys with my life by even self-sabotage.
And crosses the line constantly. How can you not see it is there to cause harm on to my life?

 

It is a fucking heinous thing.

And it is lethal in what it does.

It escalates.

Deliberately.

 

--------------

 

You are fucking delusional crazy mr Musk.

And you are after my life.

Anything you say, will be accounted for as INTENT to kill me.

 

You say these things despite my defense.

There UNDENIABLE intent to kill me.

By distortion of narratives.

 

This guy isn't going to stop.

you know this authorities.

 

he is crazed.

 

When he helps, it only goes back to those attacks.

It is a means to buy your sympathy, or credibility to himself.

All these people do, is manipulation of the psyche and perspectives by gaslighting.

See through all that.

 

Where am I? Stuck behind a screen, blind.

Who am I? Just a person who participated into the competition he initiated.

What am I doing? Defending myself against these attackers, BASED ON THEIR EXISTING DEEDS. So I might get the incrimination points sometimes, but it is ultimately to YOUR assessment, the mediator, is it not?

I do not hold the control. You do.

You are the ones with the sight and thereby assesssment of their deeds.

Keep calling me a killer, when i've been trying the opposite.

It is only the few who are deserving, who is relentless in their attacks,

on-going, escalating, no matter what. They do not stop.

 

 

And if that is Elon Musk, then what does he deserve?

 

 

They can see themselves however they want to be. (Elon Musk, Adam, Mark)

They can try gaslighting themselves to you. (Steve and his acolytes)

 

But it's all about getting away from their existing crimes, by trying to destroy me.

(Nevermind if that is no longer Adam and Mark)

 

But see through it.

 

A million words. Makes no difference as to their crimes.

 

 

Cause and effect.

They have always been the cause.

I have always been the one defending against their attacks.

Look at my situation.

Who is attacking whom?

 

 

Stop listening to all these misdirects from these people.

It is only FILTH you are looking at.

 

It's not just my opinion is it?

They stand on grounds of what they have done and doing.