--------

Unrelated.

I am seeing, "Why Hitler failed at art school."

and the context reads, the admissions rejected him.

If my sister is saying this, she is lying.

I never created a portfolio like mother's students,

nor did I ever submit anything to be admitted.

My mom wanted me to enter ANY type of college.

For me I thought, it was a waste of time and money.

And furthermore, I was arrogant.

I believed I was something higher back then.

So no, if my sister is making something up, she is.

 

 

-------

As for the "ninth gate" video relay, "you speak lightly of forgery."

These, if they are real people relayed,

they are IDIOTS.

The only thing that counts is that it was communicated to a third party or not.

Otherwise these idiots are judging CONTENT that is developed.

And no matter how convincing it is,

it is the TIMING that is accounted for in the court.

Which is only a follow up from myself, and UNTIMELY as well,

which manifested eons later after it was present on the channel,

and contradictions that must have been said by the witnesses,

but no longer can be supported.

All these idiots,

are fronting narratives, stories, content.

This is the basis of evil. It comes from an INTENT to turn things over.

This includes, I believe, Obama.

As things get near to the end, and people are in trouble.

The law must be fair, and logical.

(Screenshot)

 

 

Antagonize me and see what you get.

You are only revealing your intent, your desires.

It's not even a perspective.

It is force, you are relying on.

 

And amongst, infinite number of framing.

There are no differences in what it does.

It simply continues to frame.

A person, if they were the victim,

they would hold on to the claims of theft and stick ONLY by that.

Instead trying to do the supposed, same deeds before the law as the perpetrator.

It would mean this person has no fear of the law, nor respect for the law.

That is not true. It is trying to get away from the crimes that is committed.

And in fear of that, instead continuing on with the confession,

it is trying to create further doubt. It is trying to mislead, in order to get away.

And to flip the table around.

Force is the only way 'out'. This is its psychology.

That brutality, unreasonable savage, can be seen by its own value systems.

And behavior. Since the beginning with the "gay bashing".

Please don't make a mistake on who this person is.

It is not narrative I am relying on to try and show you who this person is.

I am merely reminding you of the series of crimes it has done.

And how that cannot exist, if it were the victim.

 

--------

Recap on Biden and Obama.

Attacks on my mother and cryonics facility were real. Please state the reasons why. Cryonics facility itself, its members as well. All these were before the law, and convincing the law of it. It comes from intent. Where that intent was unnecessary.

"One drop rule". This I believe was framed to me, fronting Mitochondria Eve that every person has and predates any concept of race, to assert an identity for its alleviation of crimes. Both assertion of identity and excuse confirming itself above the civil rights. Subjugating basic human rights.

Public display, even my bathroom, fronting what is long over, what is not their affairs. When the alternate option is their private viewing by the authorities and recording.

And isolating me in this situation, without the right to remedy and correct by the law, by my proper observation. By my rights.Hence all means of attacks begin, people believing that I can be exploited.

And this, reinstating the court's decisions on the convicted,  to give them another chance to frame, that is Anna and the gang, must also be accounted for. It wasn't once or twice, but endless attempts to give them re-chances, as the topic was already over by my defense. But that was dismissed, in favor of their framing, even as they became in repeat, convicted. This was Biden's assertion.

Unreasonable rules trying to take my ideas. Such as that of "he doesn't know what he's talking about", on the website presentation" and trying to give Mark and Adam the credit over it, even though it is my idea, stating that their skills is what dismantles the origins of my idea and they get the right to it.

Now ask the witnesses, IF these things had been attempted BEFORE the framing on the presentation as a spy. As an invader. When it first admitted the effective usage of my presentation and its potential, and trying to create an 'army' of people like I, with first praises, and THEN it turned into framing. Assigning on to me the death penalty.

This entirely reveals INTENT. Instead misunderstanding.

Now Obama, staying silent on that, as well as everything Biden did, makes him a culprit.
And now justifying everything as well. These are heinous people trying to subjugate my rights.

These "open source" as well. What belongs as credit is distributed properly. It isn't TAKEN.
Whether it is based on existing technology or not. And most my designs are unique to function, to reach practicality of effect. That solution hasn't existed, that is why it is not in application. However, the fucker is trying to assert 'communal' reasons in exchange system, that is apart from the patentable law, and inserts its perspective and philosophical reasoning to subjugate my ideas.

This, alongside all the other things this person is supporting my enemies with, must be accounted for as intent to harm. This includes my lockdown, and justifying this. This is an insane character, callous and vulgar, brazen in its shameless efforts. Behind that mask of civility and excuses of 'greater good', the authorities must see that this person callously demands my sacrifice and laughing at it.

 

If you the authorities believe, that as they try and mislead you, as if all this,

is a matter of perspective.

It is not.

In that reasoning, self-reasoning for justification for their actions.

Anything becomes rationalized.

This is why we have set laws.

So not exploit.

What they are doing is trying to reset that law by assigning these perspectives.

But perspectives stemming from personal values, that is not the law.

That value, demanding sacrifice from a person, who is already the weak, already the subjugated, the already cooperating,

must be understood as 'intent'.

Why you are confused by Obama and others. Nobody is above the law.

Nobody is above basic human rights. Nobody is above giving the weak, a chance to fend for himself in the court of law. Where there are the mediators.

That rationalization why it must be this way, this is the evil you are seeing from Obama and others, for their benefit and their goals.

Andn they must be accounted for their actions. As it does not stop. As it repeats.
As they, instead remorse, justifies themselves and gets away from the crimes done.

This is called fraud.

This is unreasonable excuses made, to convince yourselves. Under that face of trust, that 'righteous' image.

But I hope you get to the foundation of freedom and what human beings stand for another.

No person can be, nor should be, mistreated and targeted in this way.

Justifying this. IS the evil.

 

 

----

If also, they try to make my ideas open source, that is reassigning my ideas to their narratives.

Please see the unique principles (first principles) that is behind each ideas, and how the idea is evolving into function from those principles. Those principles are based on physics. Not by another's idea. And what they front, are similarities, and existing technology that is long expired as generic use.

It is stories they assign, when my credibility belongs to me, and their credibility as existing technology belongs to them, and shares must be divided in this way. It is wholly MY decision to make it open source or not. Not they. That is by the fair law.

And these refutes, and 'debates' coming from Obama is to distort the natural order of the law. All of it.

And while i'm sure he is using civility to approach this, with convincing words that describes his perspective. But please see the nature of what he violates, and how that is intentional and sacrificial as my harm and damage.

It is about asserting control and convincing people of it.

There is the evil, in where it should not even begin.

 

Who gives the right to make it open source, when I have the right to withdraw use of my ideas from yourselves?

Does the idea function, without my ideas?

Then what gives you the right, stating the generic use commonplace technology in the now?

This is force of control, it is attempted fraud by self-justification, an attempt for subjugation by propaganda.

Please see through it clearly. These are people so callous that they laugh from within as the go about things in control. Master manipulators of the set law. That they RESET.

Words have no effect to what is the natural order of things.

 

It is only their intent they are revealing.

 

And that laughing together getting away from their crimes against a singular civilian who is pummeled, who is the absolute weak.

There you see their evil.