I get the feeling that Obama was gaslighting on many events that's happened,

but stating it's not happened. And witnesses are staying quiet on it?

No idea. If so, please speak out.

If there is any contradictory points you fear speaking out.

Try and question.

 

 

It means that he's been gaslighting a lot of the events.

Antagonizing me at every turn, or trying to.

 

If any exists.

 

Simply denying my statements because I was not seeing it.

While there are witnesses to state otherwise.

 

 

Because i've been getting this relay a lot. (Screenshot)

Every time I fight someone.

"Barack Obama asked if Aliens were in government lab."

I thought he was at my side first but no.

 

So go through anything he's said that was against my statements.

You will find that there are witnesses supporting my statements.

Obama I believe is gaslighting, using the fact that I cannot see.

But I respond by sight, limited as that may be. They are from the relays,

then people reciprocate to it. I understand there are confirmation of what I see.

And interactions that follow.

So if he's using highly sophisticated form of gaslighting, with an ultimate motive to subjugate,

lesser is likely to be the same. Verify with the witnesses.

 

I've seen that relay a lot when I was fighting Steve as well.

So what was he saying?

Can witnesses fight against it?

 

I am under the belief that, he blatantly says no to events that's occured.

 

 

Looks like I am right judging by the relays.

It means this person is callously laughing from within to my situation, as he always has.

This is a measure to help the convicted.

And that is by framing myself.

If one doesn't remember, they can't say anything.

But if to state "this didn't happen" while it has.

Then that is intentional gaslighting. He is asserting false memory.

It is by design.

 

That is something major.

This is...

A huge conspiracy,

these people are toying with my life.

The supposed leaders are gaslighting right in the open.

 

That is before the law.

 

This is happening *as he utilizes my mercy on him.

He sees it as an opportunity to use my trust towards him against me.

He's been antagonizing myself to save others.

Isn't this whats happened?

 

I do not help people whose been given mercy and that use that against me.

 

I do not think that is correct for yourselves authorities, at this point to show leniency on this person.

 

Please don't say that I haven't tried.

It is they who continue to exploit, despite my trying to alleviate, be lenient.

 

If they are trying to destroy the person helping them, getting greedy.

I am not the sacrifice. I am not a punching bag.

 

These are high profiled people. I know.

Incriminating them, lessens my chances of being contacted, I know, perhaps.

But.

Authorities.

Am I suppose to compromise before crimes done - before the court of law?

Am I suppose to accept that deceit and rationalization of evil?

 

 

Witnesses must speak out on what Obama was 'incorrect' on.

Facts and events spoken out as "not happened".

 

Whenever I said something as my defense that relay kept coming up.

 

"Because no one memed the time it happened." -Elon (Vegeta)

Then assume both events happened. My side and their side.

Which wins?

Mine.

Because I am here. I am disconnected to the witnesses.

I am speaking what I observed, and that cannot be in alignment with the witnesses.

Nor do they have any reason to mislead.

Their memories are correct,

whereas my opposition has a history of gaslighting. All of them.

 

They are misleading.

 

We are cut off from each other.

If what I say aligns with the witnesses, that is the truth.

 

People can lie and say "it didn't happen." That is easy.

But it is far harder to bring up an false memory. To create an false one.

And between multiple people who aligns and asserts more facts.

It means those memories are the truth. And also in alignment to mine.

This is cross-referencing.

 

They are lying through their teeth, in order to save themselves.

The people who says it didn't happen.

 

The number of it counts as well.

The number of times deceit, the number of times contestation to that deceit by the witnesses,

and by variations.

It means they are enforcing lies. It means there was a conspiracy.

 

 

Bring about concrete reasoning, witnesses. Facts of events, excerpts, reason why.

How it begin, everything.

 

Then there is no way, in that barrage of information, they can claim it didn't happen.

 

 

 

So anyone who says it didn't happen = designed lie.

It is for self-preservation.

 

 

 

If everybody's in on it.

Do I have a chance, King Charles?

If I was winning, how?

There must be then people telling the truth.

I ask for your help against deceivers.

 

I cannot be a victim to their distorting reality.