It's a menacing character as well, waiting on that kitchen table, sitting in a chair for hours to get a photo of me in an embarassing state. What i mean by trying to instill into me shame.

I was something to be mocked at, even now. I didn't take care of myself, I couldn't.

Glued to the screen, relying on unisom (sleep-aid for insomnia) and all that.

But these fuckers takin these predatory behavior on to me.

It is inexcusable. This is pursuit of destruction on to my life authorities.

And this is no longer only pertaining to the Canadian court as that is when Robert confessed.

But it is the U.S court. What it did then, and is on pursuit of now, that same intent carries over to the U.S court.

Unless there is full confession, Robert Bulmar should be charged by the U.S court for its deeds at this point.

 

Creation of doubts do not count, as there are confessions from the perpetrators,

and during those confession, no mentions of their current adaptations in framing,

if to alleviate or to justify their own charges.

Not to mention even supports that followed.

So what they do, is simply forcing themselves infinitely.

But it was over, long over back then.

This is why I was free to work.

 

Witnesses please speak out on that.

 

Witnesses it is crucial you speak about its confessions then.

As has with Steve.

And Steve even fighting Robert against its claims on a "digital storage".

That there was no such thing.

It would have been caught by the monitoring if so, as my ideas begin even long before any laptop pick ups and removal of wifi cards. Which happened 2 months after Steve moved out I believe.

Which is recorded in my eBay history of buying adapters for Dell latitude E6400.

Before then I didn't have many devices and relying on this HP all-in-one computer.

Or no. I may had a laptop as well, as I recall saying to Adam I wasn't playing when I was working on the presentation. So he may not have seeing my laptop then. I may haveremoved laptop wifi earlier to focus on writing without people seeing the process of work.

It was in my right to not reveal that at the time as they can write better than I as they see what i'm aiming at. Which happened by the way.

But that doesn't matter. Bulmar confessed then. Steve supported in no digital device.

And if there were so-called idea discussions and "thwarting" like in Stan Lee relays said by Steve, that would have been mentioned then, would it not?

It was a single way support as the same merit of framing occured this, just after Steve's first confession.

 

So again. When creation of doubt, focus on the confessions by both of them.

And even supports against each other only to contradict themselves in revival.

Nothing makes sense does it? Their accusations and fabrications are untimely,

and would have been mentioned then.

 

And pertaining to the same topic of, some kind of preservation of their ideas in storage.

That would have been mentioned then when the confessions came.

Or when supporting me against the digital storage.

Or as a foresight to repeating usage of my ideas used in other places of which that too was attempted stolen without a foresight as correlation I believe, despite the gap duration between two solutions be extreme. If I am not wrong on my observation.

Steve just about tried to steal everything did he not?

So all they are doing is creating doubts. Baseless accusations.

 

 

So what counts as harm despite their history, they decide to go on pursuit of it again.

This is to try flipping the table around, this is to destroy my life by deceit, gaslighting.

And Robert Bulmar must be accounted for by the U.S court at this time.