Copyrighting before patents, or as a temporary replacement to patents, was something I learned from a very old person who was aiming to fund a land by group joint-venture, of which I believe I told Dennis at the time. Just making it clear where anything originates. If it is from someone else, I must say it.

But especially if a fucker like Steve is present in the channel, and I have no idea what was presented before myself. I cannot be suicidal and risk such a thing.

But things like this in the public domain do have higher chances of colluding.

And it can leverage on that.

However, I have a history of my own, and Suhail and others will vouch me for that.

So I do not fear sharing to an extent.

 

The point is, Steve is trying to deliberately connect itself to anything, everything I say in order to alleviate itself of crimes and continue framing me.

And the authorities must see through that.

When if it still pushes for impossible number of ideas as theft,

or when topics correlating to current framing had existed before but without foresight and following an solution,

under it, is merely an intent to attack, to frame.

 

And what must be counted for, is not the ambiguity it asserts to create doubt.

 

But to count its deeds at the height of its crimes, height of intent.

 

And that continues, no matter what.