Here is a email sent to Steve on Nov 27th, 2020. I moved in there at Sept 1st. 2020.

In it, I am sending to him my connections to Cellagen. And my prospects.

 

What follows in this line,

Is what begins with the asterix (*)

 

I am informing him about my projects with Adam.

"Investment for the projects, I must get the presentations rolling."

These are the 3 projects at 4 million each, from Adam.

 

It will argue on the semantics, but please look at it closely:

 

---------

 

 

--------

I will highlight the important parts:

 

"Investment for the project(s), I must get the presentation(s) rolling...

Thankfully, the investors are patient. Once it goes through... It will expand.

Then the cell therapy (my aim).

Wish I had someone to go over the presentations and write from the beginning,

but I guess you're not the one for this.

I believe I am continuing from my previous submission of presentations,
and now to add to it, to the segmented data website and the conversion
from wood to metal on the ship.  

I am clearly differentiating that he is separate. *And that there are multiple presentations.
See what was submitted to Adam by the comments made then. THOSE are the ONLY presentations I submitted prior to this statement. So there cannot be anything else.

And I am stating that it is mine.

And following this email, I am updating him on my progress of the presentation.

And subsequently saying to get out of his hair. (Because we are fighting constantly over the door. Which is also shown in the emails)

It was about during this time, between Sept to November I begin telling him about the investment prospects and what is going on. During my first move downstairs,
within about 2 months.

Sept 1st. He helped with the rent transfer, as I couldn't access my online banking.
Of which I paid back to him in cash and received a confirmation email.

 

 

 

 

 

 

So no doubt, Steve will try and argue on the semantics.

But are you stating that, after I told you about my prospects with the investors,

the situation in the house, between that September to November, which is about 2 months.

Are you saying that within 8 months, you came up with my ideas?

In that short a time?

 

---------

Now, if he is stating that it has. Within 8 months.  

Steve is stating that I have told him about the investment opportunity after I moved downstairs. Has he confirmed this?

 

Then here is another angle if my timeline is correct and assuming if he's done this:

 

1. See if my ship idea was submitted to Adam BEFORE September 1st. Which is the date I moved downstairs. And I have not spoken to Steve in a engaging way as of yet.

2. But IF he is arguing that because I brought down the CNC machines to try and deal with Cesar. And sometime during this, which is before I moved downstairs, if he claims that he came up with the ship idea and I happened to thwart it.

3. How can I thwart it, if he only knew about the investment opportunity AFTER I moved downstairs? The reason for thwarting would be to thwart from the investment opportunity right?

4. So if he's said that it was BEFORE I moved downstairs, he asserted to me the ship idea,
of which he didn't. (He never has. It is my idea). Then he just lied. Do you see this logic?

I am speculating just in case he tried misleading by adaptation as I was writing. And contradicted himself this way.

 

But if he didn't,

 

you can plainly see in that email, my presentation(s) are complete and it is mine.

you can see that, by connecting the timestamps made on to Adam, and the email.

And to see if there were any other ideas other the 3. Unlikely, though I am unsure.

But you can also see, that I am following up on my own work that is relating, by seeing the

following emails, which is the progress update of the presentation(s), to "get out of his hair."