Again Stallone saying first blood.

No, I exposed a crime that was unaddressed, and suggested BASED ON HIS EXISTING DEEDS.

Outcome depends on the overall assessment of his deeds. The mediators, the abjudicators.

 

That isn't first blood. At all.

 

It's NOT in my CONTROL.

 

 

Sorry, grammar, added:

FRAMING is

CREATION of deeds.

 

Creation of acts I did not commit.

 

That is FULL control onto itself.

Control over my life.

Control over the law.

BY DECEIT.

That is called INTENDED MURDER.

 

 

 

And it is UNENDING.

RELENTLESS.

Even as my suggestion on the capital punishment was rejected and dissipated there and then.

 

 

How many times did it frame me?

Each and every attempt counts as new.

It does.

It cannot be counted as an entirety as just 'perjury' or 'theft'.

 

Every attempt was intended destruction on my life.

 

Because it is under the prestatement that ENTIRETY was stolen,

however many a mass number.

 

So each attempt, counts as attempted murder.

Am I making sense? Does that sound fair?

 

And as you have asked it,

IT HAS NO INTENTION TO STOP.