Everything Steve has done has been FRAMING. And it's been proven to be.

It asserts humanly impossible things. By memory, situation monitored and knowing, risks, reminders, confessions, timing, repeated framing, its character in demented vanity, endless reasons have followed.

If there is no full confession.

It lied yesterday I presume, stating an impossible number instead stating there was none left. Out of its pursuit of malice and showing its intent.

And because it retracted that, which was also a confirmation of its intent from previous as well in the previous deeds which continued to that moment,

*Somehow just because it declares it won't do it again because it's not worth it, it is alleviated from lethal intent from previous? And its harm is dismantled?

*If ANYTHING, the deeds from the previous is solidified guilty by that admission of a lie.
If it stated it's a 'sacrifice', and it won't try harming, not because nothing existed in the first place as stolen, but as a 'sacrifice'. Then framing remains exactly the same.

Dangers are on-going. Nothing has changed. How would anyone listen to this?

If it said it's a sacrifice, it just left it ambigous again. It can revive at any given moment.

Saying something like "I was going to sacrifice myself, but not for this one."

How do you buy into that.

 

NOTHING has changed.

 

Capital punishment if it was in effect. Remains in effect.

 

No. That is giving into power this evil has created. It is catering to its convenience.

Matter of fact. Unless full confession is present, its deeds and its lethal attempts remains same and the harmful intent also remains the same. This is not repentation, it is calculation in callous statement stating it is 'sacrificing' itself, while keeping that defamation and framing on to me just the same.

The harm is absolutely, on-going. And if capital punishment was applied before, then it remains the same.