On Steve, didn't it claim it was 'hired' to frame me on intellectual property before as well?

Then that too is confession. How does it continue after what it says resembling things like this? Why do we allow it? (And no, I doubt it was hired by any)

 

And can someone please go through everything it has written, all comments and attentiveness to see how it contradicts itself?

 

But especially the beginning stages as compared to my writings, when i'm talkng about my ideas.

 

There is a reason why it is attempting theft now, instead then.

It means there was acknowledgement of my ownership in these ideas.

 

This must be searched through the comments.

 

Has anyone tried?