It seems like Laura is at it alongside Steve to frame me.

Then she must be charged fully.

Whether that should be from the States or Canada I don't know.

As it directly pertains to the matters in the States which is connected to my well-being.

It means she is aiming for my destruction.

 

Now I apologize if I am in the wrong that Laura is not framing. I just keep seeing the relays,

and having seen her character before, in trying to create a love triangle that she is aware

that there was nothing between her and I.

If so, whatever they say, is PRIOR to Steve's confession in mugging because of jealousy.

One must look into Steve's actions following that confession as well.

It attempted stealing more trying to convolute the perspective as if it were a joke,

or something light. If what they say, or fabricating exists, alongside the confession,

that would be the first thing asserted.

Instead, following the timeline, what you will see is Laura's sudden intervention.

Compare that to when she first came online to that channel as well, and her sayings

at first. I cannot see, and I am speaking by logic and intuition. So one can verify.

And now whatever they are presenting is adaptation and improvisation to being convicted.   

 

 

What is being said, whatever it is, if it is about MY intellectual property connecting to them.

It is a lie.

 

I may say this a thousand times. And thousand times, it is relevant and accurate.

This is reality. I CANNOT PRESENT SOMETHING THAT ISN'T MINE IN THIS SITUATION

WHEN I AM BLIND. THEY ARE THE ONES EXPLOITING.

 

That is it.

 

 

If Laura is framing me. This depends on how she is saying things.

But if there are elements of framing. Which includes a love triangle, she absolutely understands there wasn't one.

(I barely spoke to her, and I left a note saying I will be moving downstairs to the basement

because it is uncomfortable beside a different gender) (We were sharing a bathroom).

 

What she is doing connects directly to the States. She is exploitative of the court of the States. Exploitative of my situation that directly is the result of mishandling of the government officials of the United States as well.

This, is about fronting a convicted thief, who relentlessly lies, and aims for my destruction and supporting him who is allocated in the States. And therefore, her crimes, even as she
resides in Canada, she should be extradited as she becomes convicted by the court of the States. Not Canada. This isn't the trial that is based on Canada.

 

 

 

 

 

From what I can tell, I am not entirely sure, only hearing from ear from my room,

but there were few instances where Laura came downstairs and acquainted Steve,

as he came out of the bathroom naked and she was surprised or something like that.

Until to that point, I don't think they knew each other very well.

 

So they connected since then, but it seemed like they had a 'fling' instead a full relationship.

But that is their business, and I do not know for certain. See when they met together,

and when it ended physically.

It must have not been a very long time. And certainly before the confession from Steve,
and when Steve moved to the States.

 

As i've listed my logic, please look into their stance since the beginning. I believe

their stories are inconsistent and incorrect as to the timing and timeline.

I think that they are being exploitative together, from a shallow surface, and trying to frame me by creating a narrative to reach a goal of my destruction and for their greed.

And maybe judging by how she tried making this into a love triangle, when she is completely
aware there was no such thing between herself and I.

 

It is conclusive to me, that if she is antagonizing me supporting Steve, then she could be
creating a narrative in order to frame me. Possibly by fabrication that exists only by herself,
isolated, or by something spoken as words during those times, which was relayed from Steve
which is from myself, as his. Pre-meditating as to create a false witness.

So whatever Laura is saying or presenting, it depends on how she is carrying this out.

And what she is presenting as 'evidence'. If there is. That 'evidence' must only exist within that timeline, if there were such discussions with Steve. Which is of course, long before the confession.  And their stance since the moment they came on to the channel, to the moment
of confession and thereafter, which is an impossible duration of years.

Why the sudden change, means absolute mislead, adapting to the situation and their false belief that the public is buying into it and I would lose. It seemed like those were the times,
people were turning against me, if i'm not wrong.

So it would appear to me that they are opportunists.

 

Now, i've briefly seen Laura stating "I blame myself." At some point as I reacted to her.

So if I am wrong about her antagonization, then I apologize.

If otherwise, if my speculation is true, then she should be charged for whatever
that she is doing.

 

 

Issue here is that, they are well aware that the public and the authorities are not informed

of the past events. And that lack of memory, is what they exploit with forced narrative.

It means gaslighting is always present.

 

So the authorities must take my word. Because I am not trying to mislead.

I am asking for verification and investigation into the past, and understanding of the logic

involved in this situation. Emotionally, statistically, what they say is impossible.

Alongside the many lies that must have already been identified.

 

Yet the criminal wiring is in repeats. Force. Irrational passion that distorting the reality
by their narratives is the way out.

And basically, they are aiming at your ignorance on the matter. So it is exploitation.