As you can see.

 

Whatever angles of doubt they are trying to create.

They simply are at it.

 

*But all logical evidence, situational and emotional, that I cannot be presenting an idea that isn't mine, unless I am aiming at self-harm.

*Psychological profile of its values (Steve and his brother) and repeating CONVICTED behavior,

and now,

*Supported by TANGIBLE EVIDENCE of the past, indicating a complete separation between him and I as in PATHS.

 

And in-between all the discoveries of contradictions and inconsistencies.

 

 

You have the answer.