On Steve,

have you folks taken the server data in timing,

and compared it?

 

Why am I asking over and over again? This is the third time, I asked this long ago.

 

 

 Think about what this person is.

 

Do not try and turn the table around with superficial reasoning from it.

 

That is often what I am sensing from the court.

 

The evidence is already clear.

 

I am going say this again and again, because it is just ABSOLUTELY TRUE.

 

EVERY IDEA IS MINE.

WHATEVER IT IS, THAT I SAID.

 

NO ASSERTIONS FROM STEVE. NO COLLABORATION FROM STEVE.

 

END OF STORY.

 

FIND THE EVIDENCE, IF YOU STILL HAVEN'T.

 

 

It seems to me, these people are exploiting a chance to turn the table around.

Why would 'juries' be present, when you know their thinking may be limited to the timeline?

When it should be the judges, and people whose been observing all this from the beginning?

And my evidences are dismissed?

Whereas his 'evidence' must only be by slander, because there is no tangible evidence?

What is going on here?

I apologize if I am getting these relays wrong.

 

Is this a kangaroo court based on witch hunts and superficial reasoning?

Why is this person's lies, bought? After all it has done?

It never deviated from its character.

NEVER.

It's the same.

How do you buy into that?!

 

 

King Charles, I swear to you.

My ideas are my own.

Nobody gave it to me.

Or collaborated with me.

 

This is insane.

 

 

 

If by chance, Elon Musk is contradicting himself and supporting Steve.

This is from nefarious motives.

I apologize if I am getting this relay wrong.