I am reading,

 

"Walt roasts Jesse's Meth"

and claiming that is his, and I have somehow 'copied' it.

Walt from "Breaking Bad" was often relayed as Elon Musk by the YT algorithm.

 

If Elon Musk again, is claiming something unreasonable.

If there are any witnesses, please state otherwise.

I just can't trust this guy. He seems like he can instantly stoop low for the fun of it.

 

 

I would like to say to Mr Musk. Your follow-up on my ideas may indeed be brilliant,

however, because it is, you just may dilute the origins itself.

That is how your reasoning may work. It is completely lopsided to your advantage.

Now you tone down that delusional ego, and speak clearly where it began.

If you are trying to mislead.

 

It would appear that if i'm correct, Biden has created an environment where,

basically, 'if you can get away with it, we will support it', antagonizing me.

And hence Adam proceeds with this as well. Following up on my ideas specifically,

when as a competitor, and as a person, he can start from scratch.

That underlining idea of antagonization resides in Elon Musk as well.

This most likely it. Authorities must see through their intent.

 

Please see to the contradictions Biden has made on my A.I idea,

and how Adam was to be deterred from following up on my work,

but now he proceeds. If I am correct in this.

Any software related idea, or anything that Adam has better skill on,

he will not hesitate to follow-up. When I have clearly mentioned,

that is for the investors and their team. He would be hijacking the project

as his own, as well as diluting the credit.

 

If this is true, how  many things did Elon Musk attempt diluting as his credit?

 

And he will also may present my first draft, and not the follow-up of my own ideas,

in order to make it more elementary and lacking foundation.

My guess is that he will play all the dirty tricks in the book.

Why were the past deleted? And please do not trust or give power of control

to these people on their own.

 

And please note that no matter how good the follow-up is,

the follow-up is a follow-up from my idea.

It would not exist without it.

And I have called out the first principles, its foundations.

That is why there was a follow-up.

To be trying to take credit, is entirely coming from the ego.

When it is unnecessary. If that is happening,

it would be like dealing with an unreasonable child.

Adult. So it would be diabolical reasoning.

 

I don't know where that channel is held.

So if it is designed in such a way that the past isn't recorded,

or if customized, the owner must come into question.