On the  hospital staff, I wasn't of course rude in the beginning,
I was asking for help, it was a plea, as I did to few random walking aorund

helplessly. It was only when after that 'discussion' (of which i've written about)

on validity of cryonics, whether it was possible or not (which they took it to that direction)

when they should have simply respected our beliefs,

and made it into a contestation of which I cannot win. It was cornering,

then they gave out a finale, a judgement in preference to their own values.

KNOWING that the decision is devastating for us. KNOWING it was a matter of life and death for us, vitrification is preservation of structure, protection.

So while in knowing our devastation, this was, a willful harm by deliberate negligence,

a motivation that is akin to a hate crime, but in their own justification.

There was no mercy, no empathy.

When they could have.

 

Again, this is KNOWING the devastating outcome. It was giving us a death sentence.

We wouldn't have gotten help in time.

 

If there was no such discussion, no objectives or goals,

nor stating their own values of organ donation "only if organ donation" (or not help)

or "well, we won't help you."

if there was no discussion in the importance of it, and this in the devastating hours.

then they may not be liable for their actions.

but this was different. this was callous reasoning to their own advantage,

talk to persuade us out of cryonics, stating about the improbability of it all.

and when they saw I was adamant, they refused help.

It was about asserting their own values, or fuck off.

 

This was a hate crime.

 

 

In summary, to simplify.

Their objectives (Organ donation to save others)

My objectives (Preservation to save my mom)

was the conflict of discussion.  (1)

And the question of prospect of cryonics came in a negative light,
because they wanted to persuade us OUT OF that decision to save my mom.  (2)

And of course I was ADAMANT on saving her.

To that the response became BLUNT.

And they decisively decide NOT TO HELP. (3)

Not because of any hospital policy, but because of their value system.

Further, KNOWING that our time interval in getting help is LIMITED,

that the life support must be taken out immediately as she is clinically dead.

They left us knowing it is impossible  to get help UNLESS they helped US.  (4)

(within that interval of very limited time).

 

Can you understand what went on? They held every card, and they misused

their authority to leave us in the dust. AFTER the attempt to persuade us out of

saving my mom.

And that is deliberate negligence knowing the devastating outcome of harm

that will follow (1), and motivated by arrogance/self-reasoning of which they

are not qualified to judge (on prospect of cryonics) supported by their own moral
values (organ donation) (2)

Meaning, it became a contestation instead catering to the best interest of the patient

and his family by their effort.

So they must be charged accordingly, even if it is a policy not to help the patient.
(which isn't)

it was ultimately, their decision.

And they must be charged because they made it into a contestation instead trying to

help, cater to our best interest. The assholes took on an antagonizing stance and left us

in the dust, knowing we cannot do anything.

If not direct help, passive help could have been offered.

 

Verdict: 'deliberate negligence knowing the devastating outcome of the patient's family
and their beliefs, motivated by their own belief system, ultimately asserting and standing
firm on their antagonistic belief.'

is I believe the lawful conviction.

 

I am writing now in case I forget. But I will address this later when it is time.

Royal family must not intervene in such a way to support them, nor should the authorities.

I apologize for the inconvenience, energy spent on this.

 

I am going to focus on other things now. I am writing in case they are misdirecting everyone
of what they did.

 

 

I hope all will go well with your therapy King Charles.

If it doesn't, consider cryonics. I will do what I can to bring you back.

 

And I am sorry, we have 'met' in this situation.

I wish that I had some time to meet you in person.

 

I am grateful for all your help.