"Problem doesn't want to let you go."

Because they want control.

You have no right.

 

And you must be charged for your attempts,

which stands above your crimes.

 

And this itself, is pursuit of harm.

 

We have covered all this.

Think back on my statements.

They revive the issue, when it is already resolved.

It is about your forgetfulness, and their leveraging that chance.

 

Make a correct argument and destroy the cycle.

Incriminate them based on their crimes standing,

and this being pursuit of unending harm, control.

 

"Mark Zuckerberg chat with astronauts but it's awkward."

Did Zuckerberg steal my space related ideas as well?

This guy is on pursuit of control, always has been.

The court must recognize that.

 

I am not a random stranger.

I am a person locked into this situation by their lure.

And kept here contributing in trust.

 

And they abused it in unfathomable ways.

Lethal ways.

 

Where that inititation and their forced bind stands,

I am exploited, that technical legality does not stand for Zuckerberg.

He has been on pursuit of control, leveraging on me.

Where first I was a victim by him and others.

Remember this.

 

This was to  be a contest, honoring the origins of each contestant's ideas and their rights.

To them, they violated someone who was in the blind, lured to that.

In Zuckerberg's mind, as long as he discards that initiation, and not acknowledge it,

he can do whatever he wants with my ideas.

And there is the exploiter, the framer, standing before you.

 

And I have mentioned how it began. Their negligence to the law was deliberate by their follow up.

Furthermore, the follow ups exists only because they already know it is valuable.

And would not be in their awareness, if without my mentioning it, also if the principles were followed.

SO it was a game of suppressing conscience and leverage.

And they think it's a business game.

It is not.

This is about crimes and criminality, and how lethal it was.

Avoiding their moral responsibility and also applied crimes by their justification.

None was about business.

It was about control by making a targeted person, a sacrifice.

 

And he must be charged for that.

 

So when he makes things out as if it is cold hard business and business rules.

And freedom of open source.

There was none.

First setting me in this situation by deliberate negligence. (Siding with Anna)

Second, luring me in this situation by rewards and competition. (Knowing that I am contributing by trust, and would not contribute, had I known I would be exploited)

Third, ignoring those competitive rules and aiming for usurpation as a follow up.
(Fronting skills over origins, and origins in their force, becoming open source, by their iteration,
knowing that it is valuable and their awareness came only from the targeted misled)

Fourth, and justifying that usurpation with lethal crimes. (As in political attacks, attacks that cannot be set in place relative to the good will and benign as to harm my presentation was, and hid the origins of it, so to destroy the competition, callously as they benefit from my ideas)

Fifth, and lethal crimes then were justified. (Stating that what they set out to do in life, entering
the fair open world market, and growing their economy, I AM NOT ALLOWED TO DO, if without them, or them usurping my contribution as a lure)

 

So think about this 1 to 5.

They were the ALPHA AND THE OMEGA of my life.

Completely making me into a fool and person controlled.

From beginning to end.

There is no conscience, empathy, nothing in Fuckerberg.

It's just exploitation of technicality, where it stands above initiated control and fully in awareness of it. Without honor, without rules. Only rules he created with his acolytes.

So all this?

It has to be charged for.

He cannot be tolerated.

Nor does Elon Musk.

All this is about is control and subjugating autonomy, growth.

 

 

"What Jesus said to spider-man after he failed everyone."

Who failed whom. How do you flip the blame unto me?

When they had control from beginning to end?

And history of deceit and framing?

You need to be charged for siding with my attackers, no matter what.

 

 

 

"You knew the whole time."

How can I know of things they haven't committed as crimes?

And if I knew they would, would I contribute knowing?

I had no idea they would go this far.

Suspicions can run through me, yes,

but immediately that is dismissed in myself as they are top of the top.

Their status alone is trust.

And I did not think they were capable of this, to a underdog who was trying to rise.

 

I did not know Elon Musk was in control of the platform. Wherever that is.

I did not know Zuckerberg was capable of blatant theft and justification.

I eventually came to know Biden's death penalty assigned to me, over what.

And after realizing over what, I realized Zuckerberg and Adam was framing on the presentation origins by keeping silent.

 

So none of this was in my awareness, I never knew.

I only rode on this relays until I finally figured out what they were.

And of course, if I knew that public witness opinion wouldn't matter,

that the past can be deleted at will,

I never would  have contributed.

 

I figured there MUST be honor because there is so many involved,

and their reputation also stands as well.

 

To me, it was an impossible thing.

And to flip that around and blame the unknowing,

blame the affected by your choices of actions that nobody TOLD YOU to do.

 

No. That is scapegoating and that is the law, finding alleviation for them,

no matter what, and that is obstruction of justice.

 

These people must be charged.

They are not forgivable at any level.

Please understand.