"Convicted rapist sentenced to nearly 300 years. Yahya Maly pronounced YoYo Mally also uses the name "John" on dating apps."

ROFL.

So you are trying to convict me based on what? Jokes?

And reciprocative to the girls I joke with, as funny.

And my jokes themselves, benign as to harm. But conduct in some people's eyes.

It is your force.

If any girls announce they are severed from me, and they do not want to communicate,

and I still do that as if I am their future, then you can convict me for stalking.

But I am not. All we are is mutual.

 

It is intent of you that should be charged for.

 

 

As for uncle Vernon Dudley wins over Harry or something,

regarding Eileen's husband. No. Eileen is guilty.

And there is no way out of it.

 

It is not my preference. It is based on existing deeds.

Alright? So don't try and flip the table.

It would be wrong for the law or myself to get them out of their existing crimes.

Too many has repeated.

 

 

"Uncle Vernon defeats Darth Vader."

Whatever that is,

it is intent to harm.

So it backfires on him.

 

On that relay, "Breaking and entering."

Nope. They are the ones who came in.

By referral of my sister I presume.

And they are the ones responsible for their deeds after.

So they are flipping the table to try getting away.

 

As for anyone else who was led into the channel

because of my acquaintance with them.

Look. I have to interact to go forth in my life.

And whatever and however you were referred into that channel,

is not something I can control.

It is what you do with that channel and interaction thereof in it,

that may or not incriminate you.

So don't blame that on me.

 

 

"Piers Mongan's most chilling inteview with a serial killer and rapist, unapologetic monster."

They are charged, by the assessment of the law. Based on their existing crimes.

I have never had intimacy. And what I say as jokes are jokes. It is a conduct, but *we are entertained by how we communicate. And I am more humiliating myself.

 

What you people are doing is trying to harm someone as a defendant before the mediator that is the law, that is present.

If they weren't guilty, they would not be. That is out of my control. It is upto the law.

And yet this fucker, Piers Morgan, tries to frame me by perspective.

Then he should be charged.

 

He makes things as if all their incrimination is done by my words or something. No.

 

Now I apologize if I got these relays wrong.

But otherwise, narrowly focused with the intent of harm by its delusional fucking vigilantism

over the sympathy of actual criminals, and flipping the blame on the victim himself.

He must be charged for pursuit of harm.

 

 

"Obi-wan evicts Anakin - I'll get you the money."

I never borrowed any money from you.

And what I owe the extended family, I tried paying back.

And did they not receive benefit from Elon? (3 million)

(And do not say  Elon Musk is a good person because of that, do not try to dismiss Elon Musk's endless harm towards me.)

If not, it was genuinely because of my situation unable to get a job. And insomnia.

But that doesn't excuse you of your crimes.

 

 

"Sheldon has nearly zero empathy."

Wrong.

I try to forgive.

But they do not stop harming my life by deceit and self-gain.

They are the ones who do not hold empathy.

It is in the monstrous sides to their unending abuse and deceit,

that I stopped caring.

Do not forget that.

 

 

When I showed mercy on them.

That is the moment they should have confessed fully to what they know.

Their own crimes or others.

But they went on trying to cover for themselves,

as I am lynched. My extended family or anyone else.

There you see complete lack of empathy.

And as I recognize their pursuits of series of devastating harm into my life.

As has done Eileen, working with my sister.

I cannot forgive that.

 

Some people's mouths are lethal.

Because they are highly trained with distortion of the truth to their perspective,

while the truth of their crimes remain.

It is in that dilution, sophitication of words and misdirecting perspective,

they find the confidence to try flipping the table on the victim.

I believe many journalists, interviewers, or people who are adapt at political reasoning,

above the criminal law, are capable of that.

I believe people like that with heinous intent that is justified within themselves,

is Piers Morgan, and people like Elon Musk as well.

And they must be charged for those tries.

For they already aware of their crimes but the intent to harm the victim,

to save my attackers, exists. Or to harm me by their forceful reasoning.