Waking up to see this relay:

 

"Navajo men reveal what Jesus told them about bigfoot, aliens & more."

And there is the likely image of Neal as face on that thumbnail link.

 

Yes, I have offered him a reward several years ago, if he encounters that channel and give me the link.

To which he did not succeed.

 

But this doesn't give him the right to rant or shout at my window 2-3am in the morning and repeating himself, endlessly.

He did this for a very long time and very frequently, and it has nothing to do with what I said,

but it was about his own internal struggles, and self-consoling himself through the ranting

at the balcony near to people's rooms.

 

So it was entirely because of his selfishness. As I spoke to him and he had agreed not to do so,

but does it so anyway again. Endlessly. It was torture.

 

The management here, Spencer, may enter through a court here on this matter. Not this court, but another one and I am to be witness. If the topic of rewards comes up, of which you can dismiss,

I will simply front that I will attend CAM-H and MAPPS for this, and it doesn't give Neal the right to abuse after fair agreement to stop.

 

So it must proceed. This is a matter of character and defiance in abandon.

 

"Jesus teaches how to never get angry or annoyed with anyone."

This is not a matter of me getting annoyed.

It is a violation of communal rules and direct effect.

Like I said, it went on for years and so frequently until I could not take it anymore,
even as I knew his ranting was impersonal at the time.

This ranting consisted of angry swears and self-motivating rants.

Which woke me up from the middle of the night, when I was trying to sleep.

And he comes back for it every 20-30 minutes, going back and forth from his room,

and ranting for several minutes, throughout ungodly hours. 2-5am.

Of which I spoke to him about, briefly got mad, telling him my room is right there pointing.

And then I apologized for getting mad as he agreed not to do it again.

THEN HE DOES IT ON THE SAME DAY. AND AGAIN AND AGAIN THROUGHOUT,

day after day.

To which I reported to Debbie some months ago. She told me to avoid him as i've spoken to him,

but NOTHING WORKS.

And even after Spencer told him not do so, HE DOES IT AGAIN.

This is NOT a matter of my anger or annoyance.

It is a matter of ABUSE and TORTURE.

And you idiots are deceived by another idiot if you are trying to find blame on me.

I was courteous and polite, even giving him clothing I found, and trying to help him out of this situation showing him steps to get a phone and laptop as he didn't seem to have any.

It was a way for me to compensate for access he did not have, in both what I said as rewards
and also his own situation in disability.

Again. This has nothing to do with it.

IT IS THIS IDIOT'S DEFIANT NATURE.

That was it.

 

So the court here must proceed.

 

It was about this kid's own anger and carnage. Completely internal to himself.

His suspicions on me being a fraud to the reward I offered, and the channel non-existent,

does not equate to right to abuse,

as courteous agreement between me and him, not to bother the tenants, including myself, had continued thereafter. (But he does it bold-faced on the same hour 30 minutes after *agreement, yelling out) And this abuse repeated day after day until I spoke to Debbie about it. And then some months after, it continues after the warning from maintenance.

and repeating himself, escalating the situation. It was carnage where it needed  not be.

And of course, after the abuse, I have the right to retract any offers.

 

 

So what this is, is this kid's character.

I was courteous/polite. Even tried helping as I know there are mental issues with some of these people.

But despite my attempts, the kid tuned into his own internal self and went on with abuse.

 

When he has a bad day, completely unrelated to me,

in his personal affairs,

he comes to the balcony to self-console himself and to express anger towards whatever has happened.

Throughout the years. So it has nothing to do with me if he is making it out to be.

 

I get that people here has issues. But those issues must not harass other tenants surrounding.

And clearly, diplomatic solutions had been attempted.

 

Nothing worked with this kid. He just goes at it.

 

Yeah King Charles, fronting this incident and believing in him, instead me.

What is wrong with you?

You think I wouldn't know give and take?

I am fair to people, and this is unrelated to the offer I made.

Rather, it is this kid's insanity beyond civility.

You do not torture someone based on an infliction of belief to which he neither knows it is real or not.

And just leave it be if he can't help.

(I tried helping his personal life by the way, and to try giving him access to technology)

So understand that he did not have the right to abuse in an insanely violent (expression wise)

way from months before. Yelling out profanity, and ranting.

To which, it had diminished to self-consoling rants, but it still violates house rules and affects me and other tenants.

 

What is wrong with you King Charles?

You want to use that situation and make me look like the abuser, giving people hope and putting it down?

It wasn't  by my hands. He couldn't get access, nor could I.

I see the throne dismantled because of it.

 

That is entirely YOUR wish. Be fronting incidents that I merely tried to get into the channel,

because nobody would help.

And had there not been abuse, and had he given me the link to the channel,

I would have honored the rewards.

At this point, my website must first complete, as I recognize the situation.

And I can retract the offer for this abuser.

 

 

Do you want to take the money and not give me the throne because of my askwed morality

as so you want to see me as a bully?

Sorry, if that is your hope. XD

I am not that.

I am not a bully.

 

I have been fair, and this kid was incredibly self-centered in defiance.

Not civil agreement would work. He just goes at it again and again.

So it is clearly abuse.

 

I will take it as a joke how you seen in me, King Charles,

as you followed the situation before.

No, it's not my fault. Of course not.

 

 

Hilarious thing about this kid is that he agrees with everything front out.

As I try to help him and make an agreement in a courteous manner as I am saying I am affected,

and so are the rest of these tenants. But especially me as I need to vent out the air from my room. (It is in every person's right to open their own windows)

And then he backstabs in vanity, endlessly. Staring directly at my window.

 

He simply did not need to be there, but for his own selfish reasons, self-serving reasons,

he enters the balcony to rant out, throughout these years,

and I am sick and tired of the abuse.

 

He must be charged by the communal efforts here, which after the court, will probably be his relocation.

 

Neither myself or the kid, has the ability to get into that channel upfront.

So don't make it look like I bullied him with hope.

I was merely asking for help.

To which that isn't in my control.

And for that, the kid does not have the right to abuse someone.

What grudge? As I am asking for help and I myself have no means of getting in there?

 

People think in their own selfish ways.

Even you people, think that from surface level perspective,

somehow everything is my fautl.

In fact it is opposite.

Everything is not my fault.

I was trying to get help for what I do not have control over.

Same with these people endlessly abusing my mind and trying to bind with my ideas

which was contributed in lure. I actually made contributions.

This Neal kid, did not. While I do not have control over this situation,

and was merely asking for help. So when he cannot help, he can't hold a grudge either.

 

In fact, violent slurs and expressions are insanity.

I did not toy with his hope. I was merely, genuinely asking for help.

And none of us had power to get into the channel.

How can there be a grudge?

 

 

Alright so bottomline is,

you people constantly play the scapegoat game.

Blame game unto me, when I have been a victim to the situation.

 

And authorities must be clear on that.

Elon Musk's endless psycho-abuse, this must be accounted for.

As well as his malice.

You may act like it wasn't malice but harassment.

But it was malice.

And you do not try to redeem him either by his perceived character.

It is about infliction.

Not perception.