Waking up to differentiate their claims to self-defense to hostility (which doesn't make sense, knowing I am already under subjugation and monitoring by the law and by their initiation of abuse and harm they drew out reactions from, to which, it was also dismantled with reconciliation, all these attackers)

but I want to make clear about something.

The law must have discernment on what is blocking the potential threat, (severing bridges)

to what is crossing the line and neutralizing the potential threat (through attempted obliteration/destruction of the target)

these are different things.

 

Now when I was writing this, I was thinking about my sister and her husband.

They may claim my hostilities towards my father, had them stole inheritance.

And so did Eileen.

Then that makes them accomplice.

They are completely aware of the physical abuse I went through as a child to my younger teenage years.

Yet they sided with my father.

Instead bringing  justice by the law first. And then making me into a victim multiple times,

for their own benefit.

 

Now, where I am getting at is this: while above action, isolated to itself, may dismiss itself
as "severing bridges" from potential threat, (which also doesn't make sense by the law, when the law exists)

 

But poisoning me with rat poison, when I haven't particularly done anything at that point (extremities happened long after that, by their initiations of extreme threat and abuse, towards my mother and myself)  

And as for Eileen, telling me to kill myself, (after my suicide announcement) and in *their agreemnt, and following later on the inheritance hijacking by fraud, declaring i'm dead, after our fallout of the betrayl she initiated, and trying to humiliate, mock, and usurp me in this competition by hijacking and also conspiracy by theft therefore framing (if that's happened) as well.

These factors go beyond simple 'blocking'.

 

So what I am saying is, the law must have a clear conscience about what is an completely hostile act to destroy the victim,

and what is an actual self-defense. (Of which, none exists above the law)

 

And what is frustrating is that the law becomes confused of that line.

What is a neutral self-defensive act, from an neutral stance.

And what is a crime, trying to destroy the target.

 

These are two very different things.

So please understand.

 

 

 

Please understand, I have been a victim all my life, to people older than I,

who were in control.

Since even as a child, and when 'grown up' deterred from development of normal societal expectation through that domestic abuse, and I needed help.

And these people, my family and my extended family, precisely knew where I stood,

and tried erasing me from their lives. And by taking my life, because to them, it is convenience.

And also, 'winning' in life. (By measures of success) That is how far my sister and husband goes

in justifying their actions, just because of my existence itself,

and the extended family, now denies it, but their competitive rivarly and deluded authoritative justification being 'gods' over my fate, was at the heart of their actions in comparison to their children.

This is how deluded they are, and if you trace back to their actions in detail,

which is crucial, but deleted by Elon, then you will understand how their actions show what they are.

 

 

You generalize greatly. Without judging the details of give and take.

And I am being fair on this.

There is a line in which you do not cross above the law.

My issues have always been conduct, to which was triggered by their abuse in the first place.

However, they used it to deliver ACTIONS that you dismiss as conduct.

But these are not conduct issues.

These are deliveries of devastation, manifested as action.

 

 

And my extended family will deny it. They will show 'care' and all that.

But think about the situation back then.

When my mom died, and how severing bridges went to the point of oblivion by their arrogance.

And what followed next, is leverage for themselves, self-benefit,

by my sacrifice.

And I became the scapegoat the same.

 

And, while my claims to my extended family in that competitive rivarly,

seems drastic. There IS that darkness in them. That arrogance and false pride,

over academia and recognition.

 

As for my sister and her husband, they are scumbags. They can't even feign that darkness well.

 

So the law, must see this, not by their claims and excuses.

But by their ACTIONS.

 

And you will know that I am telling the truth largely.

 

It is a plague, in this society to value intellectual merit, credit of intelligence,

to the point where existence itself is intertwined with it,

and fierce rivarly that exists to even destroy the opponent to manifest their pride.

 

These evil exists.

 

I personally don't have that kind of insane ego.

 

And that jealousy to the point of destruction, that needs to be recognized.

Even as my extended family state differ now.

It wasn't back then.

 

Mark, my cousin, may reveal some light into their false pride (the extended family).

Of course, he has no say in my family that is my sister and her husband,

their evil is far greater than the extended family.

 

 

So how much of that reality I can prove to you, is only through their actions itself.

And I am trying to give you clarity in discernment, where they crossed the line.

And yes, there is a line.

Otherwise the law isn't needed in life.

And the law cannot justify what they are, and have done.

 

Remember Eileen's previous defense as to my being suicidal and being in agreement to that.

That I believe her partial excuse was that I am not a functional member of society economically.

Where that kind of callous reasoning comes about, you can safely deduct their false values and

false pride which is none other than extreme arrogance over my life.

Other issues are adapted alongside that insane excuse.

Understand that, these are partly heartless people.

 

 

Where self-benefit exists, over my sacrifice,

and where there is no honor in fair competitive environment, and acting above the law.

And history of unreasonable harm.

They are guilty of their actions.

It has always been pursuit of destruction.

How many series of harm must be forgiven?

No. They are guilty.

 

 

Remember the humiliation and mockery and laughter as well.

These are no actions of people who were threatened by me.

It was actions of socio-psychopaths.

Actions of so-called self-defense, only comes from a humble place,

place of neutrality. Not one that of destruction of the psyche, body, and fate.

To their control.

And for their self-benefit.

 

As for "demolishing because the president ordered it."

That is manipulating the law.

Understand that I am a civilian already monitored and subjugated by the law.

The president can act to an hostile entity of uncontrollable proportions,

who is inside a network.

That is not me.

 

What these people have done were conscious actions knowing my disadvantages.

Knowing my vulnerability.

And if you dismiss this by fronting power.

You wrong the victim, and you perpetuate crimes that still manifests as control and self-benefit.

You declare slavery, over mutual understanding of the law,

between allied nations.

 

Again, you are violating my rights as the victim.

What the president has done was clearly criminal,

and criminal acolytes who shared those values,

without refute, in a democratic society that values freedom of speech and choice,

and in awareness of my vulnerability, in this situation,

must be charged for.

 

And so must you, if you decide to go with that order.

 

 

Even from my surface level detection, you must agree with me.

And these issues, will be countered with the proper law.

And it will come to that you people are exploiting the technicality of power.

Not the fair law, not the law that understands rights of all individuals in treaty.

 

U.S power is divided in three branches, in order to keep from one power

to misrepresent and misuse that power to subjugate, and wrong the target at hand.

And if you the other branches, bully the victim in this way with exploitation of technicality of power.

As you have tried infinite times with Biden.

You all must face justice.

 

 

The fuck everybody's laughing all of a sudden.

What the hell.

 

 

You as the witness to their deeds,

must have proper discernment.

To which, in blindness,

and to what I endured,

I highly have doubts for.

 

But I certainly hope that there are people whose measuring their wrong,

through their harmful actions, in their awareness, in their conscious choice.

 

All Elon Musk says is corruption. Promotion of corrupted values by force of power.

And above the law. He must be charged.

 

There is delusion, and then there is lethal delusion, stemming from his delusional authority.

It is not merely an opinion. It is the right to enslave, control, and harm, the target he advocates.

He is evil, and he must be the one who must be subjugated by the law.