From another perspective,

I think if not willing deliberate negligence.

You the judges may be incredibly gullible people.

Apologies for saying this.

I just seen a relay from Mr Petersen saying (labeled in Korean)

"Do you automatically believe when you don't understand something?"

And is that ruling fair for me, when my attention and defense is needed?

You segregate me from the court believing that I cannot counter this?

What is that?

 

It is as if you are all my parents who decides on the fate of the child.

That he would not know better than you.

 

On the contrary. We've gotten this far because of my defense.

And should I have my sight, your confusions will be dismantled in clarity as my defense proceeds.

And most likely it would seem that you are persuaded,

and in ignorance of prospects of open technology and what is capable by others as well.

And how Elon Musk consistently persuades you over his crimes.

 

Whatever it is.

I have never seen a court that segregates the victim from his rightful defense.

If this is not your arrogance.

Then why am I stuck here without equality?