Waking up to see a relay on "Lucifer morningstar" some tv series,

with "god" wanting for abusers to get along with myself.

 

You assert your own perspectives and values as in a family/familial environment you seem to believe over the fact of law, over the fact of my suffering and dangers.

You are the evil.

 

I will not tolerate that.

And that is my right as the victim.

That is my right to protect myself from further harm.

 

It is my right to demand justice.

It NOT in your right, to forgive them on my behalf.

 

Please make this clear.

 

It is NOT my ego I am nurturing over other people's lives.

It is a FACT that these are not redeemable people.

These are relentless abusers.

 

And it is too late for them to state otherwise.

"Call on the authorities to oneself."

No. After a thousand attacks, that is meaningless.

After a hundred variations of attacks, that is no redemption.

 

Justice must be present.

 

 

That is Elon Musk,

That is Joe Biden,

That is Steve Choe.

 

They must be charged.

 

 

The phone is excellent.

And it would seem the upgrade version has weaker rugged build and thermal throttling issues.

So decided to just use this.

So now I have a working phone.

Few more things I need...

Actually quite a few.

Getting there...

 

 

As for this "TAM" person from Big bang theory, who is supposedly Sheldon's best friend,

and is Vietnamese, and lived in a harsh environment in poverty.

Is this the guy who was going into nursing school?

We only hung around few times. We are not best friends.

Apologies if I got this relay wrong, but I think there are frauds going on.

 

Here are people who I considered best friends per school growing up:

 

Elementary = Gordie.

Middle school = Patrick, Mike. (Darek passive)

High School = Roy.

College years though I spent my time alone = Suhail. (Bryan passive)

 

That is it.

So if you are stating otherwise, you are trying to leverage on the mass.

Get out.

 

Following that "Tam" person relay, "Terrance Tao" relay is coming up,

with a thumbail that is labeled: "Why I co-founded SAIR".

Apologies if I am getting these relays wrong.

I am recognizing patterns in Asian names/faces + Sheldon.

If this "Tam" person is stating he had any ideas with me,

he must be charged for. I have not worked with anyone on my ideas.

 

To Victor and this Tam person.

They are lying first of all.

And the court must be fair on this.

Words and mouths are no evidence for their claims.

Which is also impossible by the timeline.

ANd I have no issues giving credit to anyone with my ideas, if I had worked with them.

So these people are asking for it.

Do you want to die?

You fucking idiots?

Either present an evidence or perish for pursuit of harm.

That is how the court must judge the outcome.

By credible evidence.

And when they cannot,

the court must understand that, on the opposite end from my perspective,

it is framing, it is danger.

And these are socio-psychopaths.

And they must be charged.

 

"impossible dream" -frank sinatra/ Steve.

You are a dead man Steve.

The court will show what the fuck happens,

when you and other cunts leverage on creation of doubt.

You dig your own graves.

 

 

The court must understnd that this is the only way to protect me from them.

These are callous individuals, socio-psychopaths, leveragin on only one thing.

That they were at some point, in physical proximity to myself.

Nothing more than that.

They are lying, but I cannot.

I do not have access to their hindsight as records,

or foresight as memory that would have been stated.

Only that I know,

no records would exist,

and they are only following up.

That is because of my innocence on the matter they create.

They are being parasite. Every single one of them.

And they must be charged for, if there is no proof of their claims.

If there is a proof. You must charge me.

I cannot say this, I am not a gambler.

My life and my ideas do not correlate with them.

And they are framers.

 

You better confess you fucking cunts.

We are going all the fucking way.

 

Proof, in this case, does not correlate with their life experiences.

Perhaps even with the third party in vaguest conception.

The details of my ideas would not exist (1)

and my name would not exist in their so-called evidence. (2).

Then you know it is unrelated to myself.

And they are framing in order to try taking credit.

This is unforgivable.