"copycat received a lump sum - and wanted to blame you for what they did."

they are charged.

but where you do not understand, or choose not to,

is that the person (assuming Elon) who gave them the lump sum had a clear conscious choice of his actions.

he was 'believing' on what is word of mouth only and choose to transact my ideas gave leverage to my attackers,

this is on top of his own framing.

When he says he did these things as vigilantism, do not believe in it.

Even if "acting by belief" was true, it makes no difference as to endangering someone by his belief alone.

But he is contradictory.

As he interacted with me in praises and belief towards me and fought against my framers,

he entirely has transacted money towards them in hatred towards me, for my abilities and trying to desperately, make me look like the framer to the mass.

He became conclusive on his own, not because he truly believed in it. (There are many evidences of this the witnesses haven't yet cared to speak out on the contradictions)

but because he wanted to label on to me an image permanently. And trying to control the outcome of the court by doing so. Raising framing belief.

If there were transactions over my ideas and contradictory actions to his claims that is precisely the reason. It was unjustified hatred. That is what was I was enduing at the height of his lethal vanity.

But especially as the CEO position was once threatened.

 

And witnesses must discuss the contradictions in behavior and acting in conclusive way with an transaction with my ideas, was over ambiguity. He did not believe in his belief, but rather contradictory. He believed in my abilities and he wanted to subjugate it by deterministic image assigning. Defamation by influential act, in order to carry out more series of framing.

The court must see through the misleads and see the intent as it was back then.

As Elon still will proceed in framing my ideas as his credit. Watch for this.