i dont know if i got this relay right on carney's new law on incriminating expressive thoughts for thoughts alone.

 

but let me ask,

what if those thoughts are *not initiative

but reactive to harm?

 

somebody killed or harmed your loved one, claiming they have,

or harmed or tried killing you. tormented andd tortured.

 

 

reaction by expression is human.

 

what carney imposes unto me, if he has, alongside trudeau is nothing short of tyranny.

 

they contradict themselves when if things of that nature happened to them,

they'd be the same. deny it? you can.

 

and that just makes you a bastard betraying the people whom they hurt or even yourself.

 

you can retract if the expression is wild, but it is understandable. if not in cases, like me, just imaginative. and yes, reactive as to they trying to kill me.

 

i think this guy is a tyrant trying to frame me by image assertion and exploitation by misuse of power.

 

watch out for that.

 

and when he creaes double standards and impossible bias by preference remember that is nothing short of communistic control.

 

this ain't north korea.

 

he should be charged for unreasonable control.

 

see how his reasoning is absurd and will cause chaos.