That is relay from Adam.

 

Elon is misleading you.

I don't know if the court is naive or willing to be naive.

I don't know which is which.

But when the man EXPLOITED what he has deleted,

with FRAMING, that is called calculated INTENT.

Why do you the court, just buy into any narratives these people make?

If there are factors in which it is a loss to him,

but in reality, it was done as an animistic flair of competitive lynching,

and now saying it was an accident.

Elon Musk is guilty.

And understand that he still goes at it, leveraging on this and gaslighting.

 

And he admitted why he deleted it at some point did he not?

How do you willing forget that to new perspective assigning when he is culprit?

 

 

The law must be fair.

I know I am a drag, trying to incriminate people.

But this is ONLY because,

I know what I experienced from them,

and this man is incessant, deceitful, stalking evil.

This is not a matter of forgiveness.

It is a matter of intentional crime, and crime performing.

Even in the now.

 

My incrimination points are done by logic.

And for you to agree to it.

No more than that.

Don't make me into a monster either.

I would rather try to forgive,

but this is bogus assertion you are buying into.

 

Likewise, if that is the law who proceeded Elon's attempts,

and deleted what is present.

And is now alleviating people based on that.

That is entire culpability and you are liable for those actions.

And all has been documented, witnessed, by the law.

Their charges already. So they cannot be alleviated.

I apologize if this assumption is wrong.