"my child your sister wants to see you behind bars.

she released a video of you in which you are clearly seen saying that you killed your..."

 

What? I killed someone? of my own will?

obviously that is framing or perspective assigning.

wake up.

 

I am fighting by the law, with the mediators intact.

and I have never tried killing anyone in my life.

 

 

all goes back on her.

i, have only asserted verbal expressions, only because of their harm.

i only reciprocate.

and secondly, when they justify themselves, by verbal expressions,

understand if there really was danger from me,

the law must have been contacted, (the police or otherwise)

and there would be no reconciliation,

or acts of harm leveraging on that peace (which would be the poisoning by using the situation of giving food and accepting) which is only following reconciliation and dialogue.

and by the way, when we were mad, my mom and i. it's because the cunt tried

to enter mom's room just after her brain surgery and trying to raise her BP in CARNAGE.

of which i blocked her.

that recording was about few weeks before mom's death.

and we have then realized what she was.

 

 

so don't even try to destroy me over what is verbal and reciprocating in anger.

words are words.

and no evil actions that is not immediate but contemplating,

justifies as self-defense. none at all. when the law is clearly present.

and furthermore, the poisoning was far before that. that recording with my mom.

we were venting because of her abuse.

 

what the bitch does,

as always,

is raising our anger, and recording the RECIPROCATION as trying to turn over the order.

This is what she has done always.

as with backstabbing to my peers.

she HIDES what she's done.

and then uses the reactions against the victim.

 

Now the law, if confused of the order.

like I said, it is simple.

words are words.

but acts of harm, belongs to them. physical manifestation.

if they were in danger, that would not be in the contemplative realm.

it would be asserted to the law for assessment.

this is because the cunt, as also she is recording mom's death callously,

is trying to create alibi.

 

what they are charged for, is not because of our venting.

but words are words, and manifestation of harm in physical realm are two different things.

more importantly, and the act of crime is about COMTEMPLATIVE DECEIT.

when the law would be present,

at the best of your assumptions, they became the 'vigilante'.

no. that's not it.

words are words, and deceit would not be needed.

if the situation was truly of danger.

and they knew this.

futhermore, more importantly, all their crimes were held BEFORE that recording.

okay? far before. she probably admitted to that.

 

the accountability entirely falls on to them.

so you lack the discernment in this situation.

i am being clear with the law.

 

furthermore, their PURSUIT of harm, in that channel,

entirely reflects on their heinous ways.

and what was admitted as harm as well.

 

 

venting as retalition may breach conduct.

but leveraging on that, and instead consulting the law,

and becoming control by themselves by lethal poisoning,

(though poisoning was held long before)

is entirely CONTROL.

and the reason why they would take control instead consulting the law,

is because SHE ALREADY HAS DONE WRONG and we are ONLY RECIPROCATING as anger.

of which she admitted to series of things she's done wrong to us.

Ok?

So you being confused, and lacking discernment in this situation,

is buying into her selfish reasoning. Murderous reasoning.

The matter of fact is, she wanted us dead.

And that was happening before our venting.

And it would not have manifested no matter what, if she didn't already intended it.

That is the nature of that kind of harm.

It is not immediate reaction like physical assault.

BUT CONTEMPLATING, giving themselves time to do so in premeditation.

And leveraging on peace.

So it was entirely intentional before it.

It was about control.

 

 

Let's dissect further.

As I recall we were venting and I said,

give her fucking AIDS or something like that.

 

Think about the reality of the situation,

of which they wholly knows.

A recluse, stuck in his apartment,

without friends and avoiding people, always.

A mother who is dying, and doesn't speak a lick of English.

What would it take to make that happen?

how would we acquire the AIDS virus?

It's all imagination as venting. Think about it.

And they wholly knows not to latch on to such things.

She already knows my temper.

YOU know my temper.

but I can't actually carry them out. Can I?

And it's only reciprocation. *Because of her actions. BY WORDS.

As she escalates the situation by her attempted harm.

And she knows this.

So no, it was not about danger.

It was about her justification and this is an excuse.

And no, the poisoning began long before that recording.

 

It is also incremental poisoning.

To eventual death.

To hide that they are doing so.

Making the person weak.

As she was already dying. (My mother, if they have done this)

and towards me as well.

That is not self-defense.

It is cruelty.

Even if it was singular attacks to mom, that is the same.

There was no excuse or reasons, to do so.

She was already dying. And in peril.

It's leveraging the situation of weakness.

Do you see that?

How danger can never be imminent, and she's justifying herself?

And my sister already knows what she is to us.

That menace, that malice, that won't stop harm.

There's a lot of people like this.

They suppress conscience and they go at it, in the name of their ego.

And self-satisfaction.

And that is the real culprit.

Not logic, not reason.

Just justification.

This is what they are.

 

If they thought they were in danger,

they would contact the police.

And the poisoning began far before that.

I know because I was defecating blood.

And we are not the type of people who INITIATES harm.

Why would we? It would only be reciprocation.

My mother cared for my sister. It's her own daughter.

Something went awry seriously to result in that venting.

 

The actions were contemplative lethal deceit.

Deceit that was unnecessary had they been in danger.

But especially with such recording.

It actually works against them having that recording.

If they can front a recording to the police, that eliminates all dangers immediately.

(If they truly thought they were in danger)

So it is entirely by their own control and self-reasoning.

 

And this is an adaptation.

That is entirely unreasonable.

The law must use correct discernment.

How do they behave? In the channel?
How do they manifest harm (by framing).
What are their character? Unacceptable malice (such as that of incest slander,

and, admission to their unacceptable violence, such as that of kitchen knives,

stealing my sound card, poisoning behind our backs, trying to kill mom after surgery,
list goes on)

 

 

 

It is clearly self-justification.

Where they apply control.

That control is accountability.

It doesn't work the other way around.

And by the endless series of their actions.

Nothing is justifiable.

They are killers without conscience.

Be clear about that.

 

They are guilty.

100%.

This is not an excuse.

These were not immediate dangers at all.

Or ever danger.

It is only leverage that they created as reaction to their harm, that they are using as excuse.

And the reality of the situation was that they also leveraged on our weakness

of immobility and lockdown.

Mom is sick, and I am mentally ill. (Recluse)

 

They are killers.

Please understand.

 

 

 

Fuck the cunt uncle trying to help them.

There are no justications.

Family.

Dialogue.

Knowing situation and what she's done to raise anger.

 

They are KILLERS.

And they carried out their harm.

They made it happen.

Without the law.

They are psychopaths.

And they go on PURSUIT OF HARM.

 

Please understand.