Keep seeing "300" again.

Who is asserting this?

 

This would include Elon wouldn't it?

Its rewards kept on.

 

No. It's lost the chance for that.

 

I am not giving him privileges over my ideas.

In exchange for that reward.

 

It tries to kill me and frame me, constantly.

 

The whole point of giving up my shares in exchange for lump sum,

is to sever my binds from it benefiting from my ideas,

and simultaneously, as you fuckers try and excuse him by fronting sleeplessness/alcohol, unreasonable excuses,

will no doubt alleviate him fronting its rewards.

Meaning my dangers will proceed.

 

That's not how it works.

 

I am unbinding myself from its abuse.

And its abuse continues because it EXISTS.

Because Elon Musk exists.

 

Whatever the punishment you give him is up to the law.

I can only hope that he de-exist.

I have the right in that hoping, because I am the one who is enduring dangers.

 

But these things you assign to me, against my will,

where my rights are clear.

Is exploitation.

 

You are binding me to him by giving him leverage.

It's not simply a matter of taking back his word on false promises of rewards.

That false promise is directly PART of his deadly intent to destroy me and subjugate me,

by however means.

So you can't partially isolate that statement and make it look like a prank,

when infinite retries of destruction is going on by Elon Musk.

 

You are only binding myself to dangers.

As you alleviate my attacker and even allowing him to leverage on my ideas.

 

Do I make sense to you?

Is this fair?

 

YES.

 

Please do not deviate this.

 

In other words, he cannot retract his statement of falsifying rewards,

because that statement is part of his on-going destruction.

You cannot isolate that statement alone and tries to diminish/alleviate his actions.

That is fraud.

Whereas the harm continues by Elon Musk.

Everything is part of the whole.

Whole of his intent.

 

Therefore all binds must be severed in order to protect the victim.

 

And my suggestion of exchange in forfeit of my shares, precisely is about that.

 

 

Why does this court, ever exploit technicality?

As you plainly see, this man is an relentless repeating offender?

And this is no matter of forgiveness, or better will?

As this man proceeds endlessly in trying to destroy me?

 

The interval in which that forgiveness was possible,

is long gone.

As you have seen his variations of attacks,

and relentlessly repeating,

 

you the law, must see from the victim's perspective.

I did not sign up for zero sum games,

fall victim to, because of an animal that cannot control its primal desires.