if orange = submarine.
if red = the pole that is standing upright, and heated to melt the ice.
green = supporting pole as it raises the pole in red following tracks.
top view (up)
side view (bottom)
So when it becomes in contact with the ice, it doesn't get damaged at the hinges.
more support.
on that drawing,
green, orange, purple are separate cubes.
each cube is slid into the left.
so purple to orange, orange to green.
and what i'm trying to iterate here is this:
that the shape that looks like a hammerhead shark, (double)
is there to 'hook' into the cube before it.
when the blue (water) is freezes over.
it's just an shape of my design, but of course the designers will create more 'hooks'
to bind the cubes together as it freezes with better designs.
the trouble is, if freezing cubes with holes in it. will it float?
if not. if must not have holes,
then as long as the cube is stabilized and positioned, with one machine,
another can drill into it to further stabilize while it freezes and binds two cubes together.
that will require some research but i'm sure they will figure it out with some testing.
matter of permutations.
another way is to freeze water into cubes and simply transport that on to land.
where it will stay frozen. XD
but that would defeat the purpose of expansion on water.
so incremental freezing expansion is necessary on water.
while it sounds... not so important.
after breaking apart existing ice, it has to be replenished with the same volume or more.
otherwise rising sea levels, current directions may change, temperature changes, etc...
And fuck you Elon.
Don't leverage on my ideas and say the credit goes to you.
ANY engineer can follow up on my principles here and build on it.
YOU ARE NOT NEEDED.
Get the fuck out of my ideas.
You can assert an opinion. That's your freedom.
But build on it and try benefiting from it, NO.
I do not permit you.
Authorities must understand what this man has done,
and he is severed from my ideas.
-------
So it'll work.