that video no longer applies.

this man is a criminal beyond redemption.

 

he is excluded in this exchange for he weaponizes my ideas to harm my life.

please understand this.

 

this man is boiling with malice and will never cease abuse and harm.

 

when crimes of devastating consequence repeats,

and you dismiss all its repeating instances as 1 crime by category.

instead the intent to destroy the person, an act to destroy the person is not charged seperately,

as insurmountable years of charges that is impossibility of alleviation.

here is where preferential treatment is present over the victim's suffering.

and here is what is wrong with this court.

there is a reason why this man and others like Steve is being given the death penalty.

it is either immense years imprisonmenr far beyond their lifetime,

or death.

but because the nature of harm is not bound by physicality, rather information they weaponize. the harm will persist on the victim so as long as they exist.

 

this is my logic.

and my opinion on the court's decision.

 

 

----------

Pasted the same thing twice.

But that is entirely accurate.

The court must understand that their repeating actions of harm is intolerable,

and each and every attempt must be charged for.

 

 

Don't make a debate out of it, thor. Chris Hemsworth, if that is you.

Each and every attempt, they aimed for my devastation. My destruction, had it worked.

That must be accounted for as separate action.

Seeing Thor and Bane debate thumbnail.

 

 

Seeing Henry Cavill's "It's not worth it." Whose side are you on?

Don't make it sound like they attempts at framing is justified as if it really is theirs.

My ideas. The situation is that I am disconnected. I am blind.

I do not have access to Elon's ideas. And my motivations were to impress him.

So this, whatever the hell they are trying to steal.

Is theft. It did not exist before, and there will be witnesses vouching for that reciprocation in positivity, impressed, at the time.

Which metamorphisized into that framing you see, looking ahead perhaps.

And the whole point of this person removing the history was precisely to frame me in this way.

He is a petty thief that builds content and gaslights, as if he is the origin, by his status and image.

This is the lowest of the low.

And I am just a person, completely innocent. Trying to impress my investors.