Why is Ms Natalie Portman ever in trouble?

All is fair before the court,

as the court goes through the assessment of situation and events,

and their deeds in relation to it,

through her statements, or mine, or anyone elses.

Court is the mediator that finds balance.

If our suggestion seems off trail. (Unlikely)

So as long as nobody FRAMES anyone,

all is based on assessment of their EXISTING deeds.

Problem is that my attackers, they attack by framing.

Creating deeds for me.

That is a crime.

Not defense to that, not reaction to that.

Stating incrimination points is defense from on-going crimes.

What else are we suppose to say in this court?

That is why people are here.

To fight fairly.

Fairness disappears with however, FRAMING.

As control no longer is with the law at that point,

but PERSONAL CONTROL.

I don't think Ms Portman did that nor did I.

All is before the fair law in its assessment.

 

 

But err... don't get the wrong idea i'm coming on to Ms Portman....

I am just being loyal as a friend. ahahahaha...

And yes, fairness.

 

 

If ppl get incriminated,

that means her statement was true.

it already means the law has agreed.

and the incriminated can't use that against her.

talk about flipping the table.

it ends when the mediation accepts.

It means the law is in effect because of your deeds.

Nothing more.

Your deeds were done by you.

Nothing can magically incriminate you unless otherwise.

Stop digging your own graves.

 

 

i need more food this night.... i got none.

no good...