So when my idea on converting the homeless by $5000, giving them a chance for means of production in their own hands,

alongside, their experiments growing in sophication with data segmentaion in linearized, with aims of a tangible output and learning through my website,

what you create is a horde of inventors, makers, creators.

but also people who will begin to dabble in copyrights, patents, sales, investment, finances,
real estate, management, and education, as they contribute their learning.

all this is related to an output of effect in an incremental way.

 

 "Police are saying, you are more dangerous than a terrorist"

this is scapegoating and framing.

 

What I say isn't danger. Nor revolution.

It is simply creation of a guideline for people to accumulate and practice knowledge

in a way that helps each other.

And uplift each other.

When there are actors who aims for chaos, then that is not because of knowledge,

it is because they are criminals with criminal intent. Of which has always existed.

And scapegoating me, specifically, as I am only mentioning what exists in the modern times, that should leveraged into our lives, for our economic development and better understanding of this world,

this police, particular ones that makes me into danger.

they must be accounted for their attempts.

it is defamation.

 

"Walter roasts jesses' product."

Fuck you Elon.

You fucking cunt.

 

Your iteration of helping people may align with my motives.

But your methods are different.

It's not the way I say it. Is it?

Why do you converge yourself with my ideas and try to claim it?

When the outcome is about better iteration?

This is about EDUCATION you fucking cunt.

It's not an invention.

And I am paving the way.

 

It's in your fucked up ego and jealousy of how I communicate and visualize so simply, in clarity.

And I have been saying these things and on pursuit of, since LONG BEFORE YOU,

YOU FUCKING CUNT. As you see with my exchanges with Suhail.

What the fuck is your problem, always trying to steal?

 

 

Anything Elon is claiming on my ideas, is theft and framing.

And there are witnesses as to how he reacted, in reciprocation of both awe, and positivity.

Back then.

So he removed the records of that and tries to claim it as his own.

Please understand that this is a mind that lost itself to cruelty.

Bitching its way into my life trying to claim it as  his own.

And it no longer even can differentiate the line between it.

What is yours is yours, what is mine is mine.

but it converges to its advantage by self-reasoning and self-deceit.

 

And blatant framing as well.

So look into it.

Understand that I am disconnected from him.

And his presentation of any evidence in the past, will not be aligned with the details of my ideas.

He is forcing it. And lying about it.

If he is not, I don't even know about it. If he engaged into same ideas.

Why would I present it then?

What is the point in trying to impress him?

I believe that this fucker was envious so he tried usurping by creating history that doesn't exist.

That must be it.

Otherwise, my ideas would've been dismissed immediately as a overlap.

So he is the one who followed up and you need to talk to the witnesses about that.

His reactions back then.