On that relay.

This relay appeared before as Steve.

Steve lies.

It didn't attack me for vigilantism, for it had the motive to aim for money.

For THEIR benefit.

Secondly, if the context of that relay is stating that I 'justified' following a confession?

I don't think so! (exclamation mark is better understood in this sentence)

If he is saying that, he is lying.

 

 

Way his psychology works is like this.

First is his own greed and vanity. And competitive values to destroy.

He applies.

Second comes as self-justification to his actions.

And it KNOWS it is wrong but in that heinous grit.

To 'win'. It self-justifies.

 

Remember that nothing had happened with me.

And Steve fundamentally knew the give and take.

Investigation was being assessed first knowing that nothing had happened with me.

And this excuse, is fundamentally a mislead.

It was not vigilantism. It was psychopathy by force.

 

 

It was just a spontaneous mistake over a phone call.

In distance.

I have told the court why that happened.

And I was being an vengeful idiot to Choi, whose wanted me to enter jail for overstaying VISA, of which he wouldn't help.

And the next day or so, I wanted revenge seeing his earlier actions with presumably an minor at the blue pango motel.

So I misled. Partly because I didn't want to sleep with what was arranged before when the random woman was physically beside us. (Which was bringing women of age) So I deterred her by replying with obscenity, knowing what Choi was. Laughing from within. I wasn't in my right state of mind.

I also didn't know that he'd actually go on pursuit of her and do such a thing. Nor did I think he was capable, since I am the translator.

 

So the point being is that, Steve knew that nothing had fundamentally happened.

And this guy is just making up excuses for his insane competitive psychopathic, actions.

And that was not it.

 

This excuse he is making, he is saying so endlessly.

And endlessly trying again.

And it has nothing to do with vigilantism.

It has a lot to do with competitive narcissistic values.

As you can see from his behavior, trying to compare himself to me in everything.

 

I, myself, don't have so much ego, comparing myself to others.

I am content with my abilities and what i've got, and improvement is my internal struggle.

Comparing myself with others is my own suffering.

 

He is an idiot fundamentally, and a lethal one at that.

And I think you all know that.

 

 

If Steve this fucker is trying to steal again,

please understand that I have been mentioning, ILP (Inductive logic programming)

for many years, if the fucker is correlating itself with it, or this concept of A.I self-learning

based on Q&A of human beings of which I just came up with as I am learning about localized

language models and its sophistication growing depending on the size of the model and its training. As you have observed.

It would have asserted this long, long time ago, if it were his.

I can't remember exactly how I learned about ILP,

but where I learned was IRC (chatting program)

and either it was Bryan Bishop or Andrew Dogherty? Forgot his name. Who was coding A.I at the time, of which I didn't understand. This was back in when I was in my twenties.

Steve has nothing to do with my ideas.

A.I wasn't even a topic and I first encountered ChatGPT during the times in the other Ecuhomes,

and was shocked by it, first time usage. And i've come up with several A.I ideas since then.

Of course, if anything was Steve's the fucker would mention it since the beginning.

I don't know if it is stealing again or not. But I am seeing it given the death penalty again.

So as I know this fucker's endless vanity and lethality. Gone crazed.

I can suspect it is repeating again.

It has no conscience. It must be charged. It is there to stalk my life and harm me as a parasite.

As for this Laura, whatever is being confessed by people now, something appears to be coming up again. Remember that Laura was aware of this, and was in conspiracy together,

BUT as part of the direct attacker. Who kept going with this. And when you charge Steve,

isolating her out of it, is irrational. That is sympathy that is unjustified.

If I am correct, this person did not confess, and went at it, attacking me with Steve.

And must be charged fully.

 

 

 

---------

You get my point.

When there is enough simulatory data acquired and organized,

and self-codes itself to result in an outcome of bodily movements,

and be able to concatenate this in selective sequences that results in an x goal

by the user's request,

this is meaningful outcome that is indistinguishable from artificial general intelligence.

 

 

 

The reasoning is already sound by the generative A.I language model.

Despite being a memory retrieval system,

if it learns to self-code based on parameters of different categories of understanding,

mimicking human behavior, and sub-branching out to specific ACTIONS,

based on data floating on the net and it combines words to meaning.

as in "wave to a person", "wave" = direct input of movement preset as understanding,

a million preset movements alongside its 'understanding of decisions to make per category,

becoming ever more sophisticated, and proper ----

result in A.G.I.

Do you get what i'm talking about?

 

You all seem to be dismissing my idea, because you don't understand it.

But I am making sense here.

 

The A.I can extract meaning out of every questions and answers on the net.

And categorize them, send them into organization.

And that organization, adds them more information of behavior.

By simulating and learning from the text.

Into action.

And from that primal behavioral categories, (which isn't much by the way,

human interaction is only ever so sophisticated and revolves around 4 primal emotions,

fear, envy, gladness, sadness and once it gets sophisticated enough to add to its archive of behavioral patterns)

next stage of sophitication are the sub-branches of specific events,

that can also translate to actions.

saying something like, open a jar, chop the wood, drive that mining equipment to x location
and run it, these things will be 'understood' by its trial and error processes it has already simulated, and pick out the best outcome of decision by movements.

so the sophitication grows, and all translates to expression of MOVEMENT.

and once it gathers enough,

it becomes artificial general intelligence.

indistinguishable from free will.

do you get what I am saying?

 

 

-------

Unrelated. The unique point of my idea is that all data that is organized, and growing, refining itself to permuations of solutions by trial and error;

by running simulatory points from all Q&A of this world humankind has created.

Taking meaning off of that, and then,

combining this with output of movements as expression to solutions.  

So as if it is self-aware, because of massive preset of permutations of solutions already covered, and choosing, because of those simulations.

So this becomes indistinguishable from self-awareness.

 

 

I am suggesting this as a next level step to language models, after suggesting my other idea
for generative idea into tangible output *few years ago. About 2 years ago.

Anything these fuckers, Steve and its acolytes are trying to take from me, framing me, is a LIE. It would have stated it then, or every given points in this channel throughout, talking about A.I. The channel, i'm sure we (as in the channel) had infinite discussion on A.I with Steve judging from "Steve jobs and A.I visions of the future." Yet not my specific ideas *were stated, was it? (Grammar)

It is taking from general place, commonality and trying to dilute this. It doesn't even know what it's talking about. It's commonplace knowledge borrowed from what its read. No original thoughts. And this is their tactic. To try and frame me by fronting what is in public domain.

So it's like this. They stand on infinite tries of framing me and following this another try.
The law must charge them, instead listening to them as ambiguity. You already know their repeating offense. And this is survival vanity, at the cost of my life. This cannot continue.

This then creates, a complete 'servant' in portable form, without human processing required.

So look into what I came up with. If they try to destroy credit. Their definition of what A.G.I,
was, was not even clear.

Talking about self-awareness is the factor of artificial general intelligence. It is not. If it can even exist without biomicmicry in hardware form.

This is the roadmap to the next step.

 

 

and no you fuckheads trying to label me as danger again.

Elon.

And whomever else.

I said, the moral eccentricity, by values.

This programming must be controlled.

If it gets too sophisticated, there can be problems.

So after the base, it is best not for the A.I to think about it.

Or build on it.

Because it is not thinking by itself.

It is selecting the best outcome of human thoughts already existing

and having run the simulations.

And it is essentially HUMAN thoughts. Human values on the net.

And it just may become confused if it grows in that.

So as long as those categories are not in its decision making,

but doing the general tasks asked,

it should be fine.

This is better than self-awareness.

 

What is this? Whatever Steve fucker came up with,

that is commonality it is fronting. The basic rules of computation possibly.

Differentiate what is unique as my idea.

This fucker and its acolyte, Laura keeps coming up.

It is creating doubt.

It's a LIE.

They need to be charged.

And you cannot alleviate them. Laura as well.

 

 

Understand that if they are framing,

it would long, long presented by them,

since I first came up with A.I advancement idea in tangible output.

Remember the music box? And generally everything else in life?

The one that I had a quarrel with Adam, as he followed up on my idea?

This is obviously a step further from that.

As I was researching on localized language models.

 

 

I am sorry to say this.

But they need to die.

I am not saying this out of carnage.

What the fuck is wrong with these people?

If they are framing?

This is relentless, without conscience.

And I cannot live my life in danger because of these evil things that doesn't have any shame in what they do.

Evil fucks.

 

 

Confess Steve.

If you are framing again.

Confess.

 

I also see Mark and Adam getting away by shifting the responsibilities of access towards me.

What is that?

First, they are asking me to break the law.

When they, as they see Anna doing her crimes in humiliating me, in the public,

MUST contact the police for.

Second, by the time I am able to, if I decide to break law for. The damage is done by Anna.

And that stalling, Mark and Adam aimed for, fronting Anna, and knowing what is going on.

They were laughing at from within.

And you the authorities think that it is my responsibility? They are aiming at an loophole of the law by asserting the impossible.

You don't blame the victim for this. They were culprits in crime.

When they should have contacted the police.

 

 

 

If they are trying to make my idea commonplace,

look at why it is unique. Don't let them try taking credit to what I am paving the roadmap for.

 

 

 

 

---------

As for "safety" these fuckers are trying to attack me with.

Unlike self-aware A.I,

it is completely up to our control, as the self-growth factor by code,

is categorized with what we permit to grow sophistication in.

And hence as long as it draws permutations of actions from those categories,

and preset of solutions as expression of output in bodily movements,

permutating from it.

Because it refines and adds only to those categories,

then there is no danger.

Unless you add moral values to be questioned by A.I and its actions follow those choices.

 

-----

That relay is coming up again. "Secret plan - Wukong and Erlang's quest for freedom."

It's BS Steve is creating.

If it is trying to connect to A.I somehow.

If I even knew about generative A.I, I wouldn't have downloaded all those books

and tried making a mosaic out of it, taking 2 months to do so. Would I?

Making that presentation.

I'd just ask A.I.

There were no such discussions. Anything computer related,

I just told this fucker to change its components to SSD so it would faster,

and the idiot went to a person and paid $60 dollars to do this.

Something that is completely up to the person to do so, and general chore.

It was that ignorant of computers.

Ask the person who did that installation for him.

And you will see by its mislead, whatever that "secret plan" as a pact is,

it is completely inaccurate by the timeline and facts, and who was involved for what, then.

So this guy is gaslighting you.

What it has a knack for, with its friends, is being a copycat.

This was caught by companies and investors before.

And i'm fairly certain, that if you look into what it has now, a lot of it is still like that.

And people are just trying to give it credit, making it the hero, because they want to be

saved by it. Making me the villain.

Incorrect.

Steve and its acolytes are heinous, lethal, criminals.

That is the end of the story.

 

Ah, one thing I talked to Steve about A.I was usage of it, in nanotechnology,

to revive my mother. That was it.

Nothing this sophisticated.

This came as increments of my learning through usage of generative A.I,

of which its encounter happened during this competition.

And like the wooden ships, and its wooden submersibles I followed in my own idea,

and this fucker claiming it immediately as I come up with it,

my current A.I idea was already asserted before as a primitive variation 2 years ago,

and fighting with Adam on it.

This fucker is guilty as hell. And Laura, the cunt acolyte. As well as his brother.

I don't even know the other two.

These are culprits trying to take my life and its legacy.

And continues trying killing me by their own survival vanity.

They have no such thing as conscience.

And they must be charged for.

 

----------

Unrelated.

"Georgie deserved better."

If that is my sister's husband you are talking about.

ROFL.

Remember that it advocated and supported every malice my sister applied on us.

While making itself look like the hero. Who stands neutral. Ok?

And towards the extended family.

Remember near to the times mom died, 6 months prior, I asked in Korea,

why the passive aggression? (unknowing as to how deeply involved this fucker is with my sister, supporting her in every step) and it was DENYING it. GASLIGHTING even the remote awareness of its own hostility and aggression towards me.

And that proof is in its stance you have witnessed, as well as what sister was doing in the channel,

and supportive. As well as its admission in gloating at my mom's death after she died.

As well as the poisoning to try and kill me with my sister. Or harm my organs at least.

This fucker,

deserves the worst. Alongside my sister.

Do not forget this.

They are something close to animals.

Something without conscience and feigning rightousness.