Unrelated.

 

So when I was talking to Debbie today,

and I said, there is no proof of allergen and that I think by the emails, she said I wouldn't have to prove myself,

just before that argument,

as I was saying, there is no proof,

she was talking about procedures in hospitals to go through, to get a checkup.

like exposing myself to those chemicals again or something. (if I remember correctly)

 

No. I wouldn't do that. Why would I risk my own health to prove?

And why would you ask me that?

 

Why ask me at all?

For references required for maintenance to change the chemicals and permission from the top?

Or has the top people already permitted and there is no more to report?

Yet they are asking me to do so. For what reasons?

 

Do you see what I am saying?

 

Not that I was lying or anything. Why would I.

Just to mess with people? No.

I was having some kind of reaction by those symptoms.

And it's stopped now.

 

So yeah this is probably an misunderstanding but I am writing because again, insenstivity seemingly and disturbed by the requests on this. From whom? And for what purpose if they don't need to report it to anybody?

Being suspicous on to me and then trying to peg me as a malice?

(Sorry, but my paranoia and logic is questioning this)

 

What is the point?

 

Do you see what I am saying folks?

How am I suppose to find proof for that?

And why would I go so far for that?

Why are they asking me this?

 

So I question the intent of it all. Weird.

Probably an misunderstanding.

But what is that?