Ok. Almost done the chores of the day.

 

So now I get back on the law.

Which angers me.

 

To cycle this statement again.

I am reading by Adam's relay. This time I think he is helping.

 

So I will state this again.

But I said it before.

 

It means that someone, is deliberately erasing the contents there over and over again.

And that is fucking Elon Musk. I can only guess. Apologies if i'm not correct.

And he's been given warnings before.

 

This is meddling with the law. And he's always been like this.

To alleviate every one of my attackers and diminish my statements and credit.

Ok? But you fuckers still let him go, even after these multiple tries as if it is a prank.

 

My fucking life is on the line and justice is on the line, that I have waited decades for with family matters. But to this fucker, EVERYONE has to be let go, and towards its own values,

WHILE IT MAKES ME INTO THE TARGET.

Remember that fucked up arrogance. Alongside his help. Ok?

And remember your own fucked up arrogance. Allowing repeats of the court, fucking with my statements. And alleviating and allowing them to go, endlessly.

 

Now. Back to the statements I am going to repeat.

 

1. If Steve is stating schizophrenia. Again, this doesn't make sense. I stated this before.

If it believes it's schizophrenia, then it must have the humility to stop itself.

it should not be saying so with an deterministic tone.
For it is setting someone else's life on fire. For life and death.

And the fact that, that excuse, of mental illness was asserted before,

ONLY to use it again WITHOUT conscience.  (1)

And confessing in repeat. (2)

It is MALICE.  Vanity. NOT schizophrenia.

And to impossible numbers, as foresight and hindsight does not exist. (Awareness)

It is ABUSE and aiming for an lethal outcome, should it stick.
AND KNOWING that there is support AFTER its confessions from prior. (3)

I recall relays like Steve Jobs saying, I live in a world where nothing is mine.
And borrowed or something like that. Maybe that was part of its confession I believe.

And people need to recite that accurately. Amongst anything else missing in detail.

So no, it's not schizophrenia, it's vanity and malice, abuse and lethals tries, rolled into one and supported by its acolytes such as Laura and his brother. (Are they schizo as well?)

 

2. On car window hit. My sister and her husband is making this up. The cracks were happening before my mom. Not themselves. I think I flicked my wrist to hit the car window as my sister was taunting me in an insult, and they were getting away, riding away in vanity/fun. But I did not break the window before them. And they are misleading the two events.

That was my expression of anger, but not one that of danger, but reaction. And their vanity.

But the law is not a matter of stories told. Neither from each sides. I understand this.

So let's break it down.

Let's imagine that I broke the window in anger towards them directly. Did I physically connect to them afterwards?

No. I would not. If that is an reaction, it is an reaction. And that is one that of direct TRANSPARENCY.

It means either they can call the police, or accept my apology. And it is reconciliated. And life goes on. I lived separately from them, and they lived separately from I. There is no urgency.
It means I went back home, and so did they.

So this is a mislead.

Poisoning a person with rat poison is premeditation while there is NO URGENCY.

It is about using TRUST as a factor to harm in an lethal, devastating way.

My responses were VERBALLY violent as a REACTION of their bullying. Which was quickly dismantled the moment it was said. And reconciled thereafter.

It was always like this. But the sister and the husband would enable again.

In order to draw out a response from me, and take only that expression to my peers,

in order to install the image, to burn bridges and make me the bad guy.

BECAUSE I was always ALONE.

It was always up to them to create stories, making themselves the hero. While I cannot defend myself in TRANPARENCY. As nobody asks me a question.

And simply listens to them single way.

Do you understand what is going on?

That has been their tactic.

So the law has to see first their BEHAVIOR in the channel that carried on from back then.

Unacceptable behavior that twists into someone's being.

How do you like being framed as an incestual deviant before the mass?
How would you like to be threatened of your mother's existence by refund?
How would you like to be effeminized and stripped of your masculinity, because of your play, a mistake? And using that as a deterministic way to make me the blame?
How about trying to take credit in everything I do? I come up with, since the presentation?
How about being mocked of your intelligence by your own sister?

She has always wanted to traumatize me psychologically, and curse me.

To bruise and scar me permanently in life, and that was her goal.

To attack the heart.

Do you know what malevolence is? And how that changes a person as victim to that?

That relentless pursuit of harm? And pure, PURE evil. That devotes itself to making me ruinous and scarring me emotionally, ENDLESSLY trying? To deter me from success, to frame me, to destroy me.

That is my sister and her husband.

 

So where am I getting at.

That their actions, as you can deterministically see, is about premeditation in their leisure and then aiming for CONTROL.

While as my actions are spontaneous, and ceased of harm there and then.

Do you see the difference?

Do you see the malevolence that goes on pursuit of destruction?

And how I am only reacting to that devastation?

 

Please differentiate. And please do not let them go. List ALL that they have done.

And charge them with an ultimatum. They deserve their punishment.