And now if they are making those excuses, it works like this:

 

1. It means they were concatenatively stringing information together in their prejudice and speculation. And come to a judgement by their vigilantism. And that is without fair assessment of the situation by asking me questions, but lopsiding information from one side only.

2. Even if their speculation was correct, the alternate lawful option is to contact the police in fair investigation of why hostility may exist and danger that may exist. In order to prevent and record by the law so to prevent any hostilities emerging without the presence of the law.
It would also mean they were trying to protect my sister from wrongdoing from the law.

3. That means they acted out of vigilantism and favoring my sister's well-being, no matter what she had done. And my death was justified in their minds for that sole purpose of her well-being nevermind the right and wrong. So their vigilantism was justified in their minds.

If they are against violence, why is violence towards myself okay? If they are avoiding loss?

It means there was no love for me. Only their prejudice and their discrimination. And judgement lopsiding to their favor, making me the blame in their minds without hearing me out. And seeing me as the problem. As Wongi's father's letter towards me blaming me for mom's death was present as well just before that suicide letter. Saying "I thought everything was fine, what happened?" (But in a tone that was blaming)

So my guess is that,

my suicide was discussed with them. And they gave out on ultimatum between themselves.
It wasn't decision by Eileen alone in that agreement.

And even if it was Eileen acting alone, no doubt my emails were relayed to my sister, and others as well. And they were observing, keeping silent, what I would do next. Without a word, after their blaming and silence as the last letter.

4. These alienation and hostile behavior that summararily results in my destruction by their exploitation of the situation. Instill into me blame just before suicidal letter, and agreement, then silence even after observation.

That destructive intent is revealed again by the competitive behavior. Trying to usurp me in their jealousy. And trying to defame me and making me look less. That discrimination by Eileen in her mockery and laughter was present in the beginning as well as Chloe's dad and the whole gang. Had their collective effort worked to usurp me by the rewards and to diminish me, what then is left to me? Were there efforts like this? Witnesses speak out.

That was the first phase. Second phase was when Wongi's dad, during that first phase of attacks led by Chloe's dad, involving all the children, and by name calling and mockery, with Eileen. Chloe's dad calling me a mutt in a derogatory way. Mixed blood. In Korean.

Wongi's dad asked for forgiveness on my mother's behalf, and recognizing this I asked help from Elon to alleviate them from poverty. And after I believe they got their help, Wongi's dad did the same thing over again, but this time led by himself. And hijacking my ideas.

I had dropped the charged then.

And this is where it gets interesting. And returning back to point 1.

5. That no matter how much they observe my sister and the husband's malice, lethal malice towards me, they are there to support them no matter what. And by making me into the scapegoat as well, even as they were not there, and they do not know me. Nor have asked questions. And contradicting themselves, having antagonized sister for a while and adapted now. It means, as they have done before, they are on my sister's side NO MATTER WHAT.

And I am to be blamed no matter what. Doesn't matter what she's done. Because at the core of it. When I am not on their side, I am someone to be toppled. To be antagonized as a competitive pawn. Hoping for my downfall as they occassionally praise me.

And my being blind, having most of these their actions correct, in antagonization towards me, by their utter prejudice and desire to defend sister by their bias, and preference. This again is their alienation towards me in a deeper way. One that is hard to believe, as a so-called extended family.

But ask Mark, my cousin. And see their conversations in kakaotalk, and emails between my sister and them. And between themselves. How much that alienation, discrmination, that prejudice, that disrespect, and even vain hostility was present, and in mockery, even before my hostility towards them.

6. Then you know what they deserve.

 

Psychological abuse as the last letter and keeping silence as my suicidal letter letter was present thereafter some time. And only Eileen could be contacted. Nobody else replied (before the suicide letter) they had written letters and then left in a gloating or blaming tone. And then silence thereafter. Only Eileen ever replied, making her the designated 'hitter' and relaying everything I am saying between themselves, working as a spy, even as I told her directly not to send my emails to my sister. But not particularly I don't think mentioning hostilities but indifference and hatred. Hiding what they had done and my speculation. Only after, long after my suicide letter, Inhee, my sister, wrote to me in a gloating tone as if they together murdered mom. "You don't know my husband, do you?"
As she monitored the phone call one week before mom's death. Which was full of my vanity as a RETALIATION to sister's attack's towards mom. Just after her brain surgery and their abuse towards me as well. But in vanity. No doubt they shared these things between themselves. And then justified my suicide. Is that right for them. Instead asking me questions but keeping that control to themselves? As alpha and the omega... I don't know. Shouldn't investigation of why my anger be present? I wouldn't say things in vanity and anger without a reason, don't you think. But no matter what, they sided with my sister. And my death was justified in their minds. Instead trying to prevent it. My death was singularly justified. I don't get this. My death was justified without even an investigation or a question. They just backstabbed me, betraying me, spying through Eileen, and working with my sister.

I think the correct part would have been to investigate. And asked questions. But they didn't want to get involved. There is the issue. That abandonment, to me, and that situation, was part of their calculation. That I am a problematic character, and it didn't matter if I was the victim of the circumstance and was fucked by life, and by them. What mattered was that I was a problematic character and it was better off I be dead instead investigating into the matter for right and wrong.

To me, that is cold, calculated, callousness. And distance. And unjustified finalization and taking control over a person who is at his most vulnerable. And by the psychological abuse as well, by assumption and prejudice, without asking me. Without asking a single question.

I was the blame. Not a chance given.

 

But I think their real incrimination point, is more now.

Because their series of actions from antagonization to support and back to antagonization even AFTER all that is revealed on what my sister and her husband had done,

they still CHOOSE to support them, and by my destruction and scapegoating.

And at that point, no ignorance is an excuse for lethal control.

Nor was then. It is collective control by exploiting the vulnerable,

and now it is exploitation by their preference, and by force.

Encouragement of crime. For self-preservation, and my sister is one of them.

And I am not one of them. That is how they see it.

It is beyond right and wrong. It is beyond justice.

 

And from there, they should be charged for all that they have done.

That is my opinion. But I leave it to the authorities...

If they can make fair assessment to the situation........

 

-----------

Unrelated to that,

Watch for Senator Kennedy trying to find a loophole to bury me alive.

In the interest of the public.

The public is not the ones whose in trouble.

I personally didn't agree to that.

The frontrunners are.

And I can't be blamed for their initiation to alleviation to cyberbullying,

and cutting off my rights to the court,

and inviting me into a competition where my intellectual contribution was exploited,

endlessly. As my right taken, was further exploitated by their lure of promise,

in exchange for productivity. And that benefit, towards them, if their attempts to hijack,

or bury me alive, as Senator Kennedy attempts (He stands on grounds of previous attempts to control by the way, I believe by fraud, I forgot what he were to be charged for. But he was incriminated at some point and I do not trust him. He'd do anything to alleviate their charges.)

 

this would be massive theft, conspiracy for fraud, and exploitation of human rights.

And violations, lethal, heinous, acts of exploitation, threats and dangers endured, survived,

only to be dismantled at the Senator's perspective assigning.

That is attempted fraud in works.

And I can't allow that, nor can the authorities.

Watch for what he says, and see his intent, and do not justify that intent.

Nor his reasoning exploiting the loopholes of the law.

It doesn't apply in this case, where the victim was CREATED by their initiation of control.

 

-----------

Elon Musk says, "you just lied."

No you stupid fuck, I just remembered as I was writing.

I think they conspired between each other, so they knew about my anger towards my sister.

But they never asked why that anger existed. By what deeds by them.

They never bothered to investigate, and gave out a decisive judgement between themselves.

Instead thinking loss of family, they wanted to see me as justified sacrifice.

It was passive, exploitative, murder by prejudice in a way. I don't know.

But no, it was their arrogance to leave a decision such as this without hearing my say.

This is callous calculation.

But that is the past.

The real problems exist, because their intent in various forms have been revealed.

And that includes their intent in vanity, collective effort to destroy by competitive values.

And self-preservation by even encouragement of crime, or *being part of crime.

Which could be part of supporting creation of prejudice, or image installation led by my sister.

Which then makes them culprits and their previous actions all must be charged at this point.

 

(Screenshot, Elon to reporter)

 

 

-------------

Bottom line, it is not a segmented thing when it comes to my extended family.

You must judge the overall.

And remember that they are judged at the height of their crimes,

and height of their intent.

No good can be heard over harm that was applied.

It may lessen their charges by small margin, but not alleviation.

Exploitation to lethal outcome, by demented prejudice and decisive actions that is inhumaine. For future unwritten, and vanity that cannot be taken in entirety in seriousness. (my phone call to mom as reaction to my sister's trying to harm my mom when she just had a brain surgery. fucking cunt. but my words were not in alignment to reality) (but they never even asked why that anger existed. they just wanted me dead. ok?)

No investigation. No questions.

Following endless antagonization and attempt to usurp.

And encouragement of crime for self-preservation.

Then following, this is their evolving as criminals and showing who they are as set value.

I hope I am being clear instead narratives. Each sentence I am muttering is by their existing deeds.

 

 

-----------

So my thinking is that, they are danger.

And that is by their collective mental hysteria and self-reasoning with eccentric and lopsided, selfish, and even demented, ways.

And I cannot be the victim to that.

It is entirely their preference. And survival at my sacrifice.

And I have heard enough.

Rather, sensing enough of it.

Even as I am blind, I can sense what they are, with just 1 relay on that Joffrey getting slapped by his uncle in game of thrones.

Because their actions and intent, that force, lopsiding advantages for my sister, by their blind prejudice. Existed long ago.

And it stays.

And that is danger.

And that is revealing who they are.

And I was always the sacrifice.

 

 

------------

As for political stuff,

I am juggling between the two it seems.

Ah, well, I think you already know what i'm talking about,

and I am the victim to their control.

What else can I be?

I'm still stuck here.

And they have always controlled me.

Taken my rights, lured me, exploited me, tried to murder me, destroy me by image assigning,

framing me, whole bunch of things.

So...

Don't you think, in all fairness,

there should be justice for these frontrunners?

They were given chances before.

Yet they still schemed and attacked.

Please understand.

 

----------

"I'm not giving up." -Elon.

All you are stating you idiot,

is that you are not giving up on fraud.

 

All of you who are trying.

You are suppressing and violating basic human rights.

You are dismissing basic rights of a defendant in the court of law.

 

It can only backfire on you,

and you are indeed digging a deeper grave.

Why are you even saying such things?

 

Don't you know all logic has been covered?

You cannot win, if there is justice.

This is open violation that you are trying to justify.

Dear lord.

 

 

 

Remember that I am a foreign citizen,

and a victim of cyberbullying who was asking for your help.

And your control begin.

Without giving me my rights, and amplifying and justifying,

intiator's deeds, in order to protect them (Anna and the gang)

and to 'win' by force. Cycling no matter what, the court,

even as they became convicted.

And the rest, invitation, competition, exploitation, threats,

mayhem, attempted framing, endless, endless,

list of crimes.

You can't get away with that.

Even right now, you are committing FRAUD by conspiracy.

 

------

Unrelated, rather than remembering, remembering what they may have done.

Most likely have done. It is my speculation, but probably correct.

I am trying to reason out, fairly, what may have happened.

Apologies if there are contradictions to my reasoning.

Overall, it should be correct.

And... I am sorry but what they have done is wrong,

and what they are doing is wrong,

and what they are is wrong.

I don' t think that is just my belief.

So overall assessment and investigation if possible, is required.

Beginning with their chats between each other,

then, between, and the now,

their excuses, how unreasonable and lopsided to their prejudice,

 and their awareness of destructive outcome of their actions.

And continued efforts to either support my attackers or joining them.

And at that point, they cannot be forgiven and all past deeds must be charged as well.

As forced intent for harm, even as they know they are instilling image for an wishful outcome

by their prejudice 'picking sides' as bias. Antagonizing me again.

These collective efforts were shown before,

and these are dangers for me.

Please understand.