there is nothing in my notes but my own imagination.

for instance,

if in the same page, there are "goals"

and then I have words like "discoveries"

how will you interpret this?

when I am writing that they are MY discoveries,

will you try and turn that around as if it is someone else's discovery?

 

the ambiguity stays based on your perspective.

 

thankfully, many events have transpired to negate any doubts like this.

but i still cannot trust,

because i think the authorities act like nothing like that has happened.

and any isolated ambiguity is ever dismissed as a whole of their intent.

so why?

 

if this is the only thing that is left, then you will get it. the notes.

but let me try first getting in there. so i can properly make defenses to what I can see.

 

--------

And again. ANYTHING that Steve says, if stating it relates to my ideas,

or as collaboration, or collaboration to set up a behavior for them to attack me (?!)

is an entire LIE.

I don't have to mention the logic of it all. The awareness in the house monitored,

and whats happened thereafter, and series and series of its unending offense.

So rest assured, we are getting there.

He must be charged, and so are others whose helping Steve to frame me.