By the way,

the court works around "end justifies the means".

so the seller of that laptop, probably got away,

stating its perceived value by my diagnosis.

am i right?

instead the law thinking about its conduct and intent,

you just think about how it ended up.

if that is true, that kind of cunt reasoning is the reason

why criminals persist and insist on doing what they do without remorse.

fucker must be charged.

be clear about that.

little or big charges, doesn't matter, it should be charged.

the moment where the buyer states the issues, just after purchase,

significant issues unlisted in its ad, and requests refund is the moment it refunds.

but abuse and fraud was clearly present.