They throw away a lot of baby related stuff in these neighbourhoods. XD
Going to sell this portable baby carriage thing i picked up. XD
And an air conditioner as well.
then i think i can grab a power supply.
picking up 3 monitors today (with bit of scratches on them) but aiming for function.
and one more on the 24th.
What can I say... garbage is my life. XDDD
Someday, I am going to spend a whole $100 dollars on food.
And eat it in one sitting.
3 BBQ chickens, sweet and sour pork, steamed pork buns, bbq short ribs,
noodles and fried rice.....
Just give me few more months...
Need equipment right now.
I have to get in there.
Need to be productive, find balance....
Has a lot to do with computers...
Need something effective as exercise as well...
That is exploitation. That video.
By "clean" suggested by "Heisenberg" = Elon Musk.
What the fuck is this?
You invite a confessed criminal into this,
and front that criminal to keep me from getting my shares?
No. The law decides the outcome. Not you.
You follow the law.
Steve and whomever else are convicted of repeating offense,
of the same nature, that is framing.
No 'ambiguity' can be bought in this law.
Any credibility is GONE under that repeating offense that is endless.
If you don't set that limiter, this is an exploitation.
---------------
Unrelated. I made some scratches on the stairs moving the record albums down.
It is light scratches that can be painted over.
My apologies. I wasn't thinking through.
I should have just lifted it and brought it downstairs....
I will be careful not to cause ruckus/and scratches from here.
-----------
In that link (screenshot)
"Sea of thieves" still coming up.
I thought Steve confessed yesterday on the wooden ships.
"A Devil admitted what was done to you."
"Steven Strange gives the stone to 'Thanos'."
If this is a follow up idea from Steve it is trying to hijack with.
It must not be credited.
Which also follows the framing.
If it still hasn't admitted to framing.
You know this is part of its repeating offense.
The law cannot buy into repeating offense of the same nature,
that is endless. It is INTENT.
I thought it confessed yesterday.
If it is trying to hijack, following up on my principles.
This environment is about using my attackers to subjugate my rights,
this is a competitive environment in a contest, of which is not honored,
and even in the business environment,
following up on my principles is blatant theft.
Stacking up everything, the wood into a large mass,
and using subtractive manufacturing with handheld router,
followed by thin covering with aluminum panels, to protect the gaps,
is my principles.
To use my principles and create variations, is hijacking,
and intent to harm. And people supporting that, is being abusive,
gaslighting right in the open. It is also INTENT to harm.
It is targeting. Please understand.
---------
What is that relay?
Obama?
If he is on pursuit of harm.
He should be charged for it.
And I believe he was. And is.
On pursuit of harm.
He's crossed boundaries,
to destroy my rights and my life.
Authorities should not be lenient.
Remember that I am only reacting.
They are the ones who always initiate harm.