On my sister and her husband, they are FRAMING.

 

*Ask yourselves, why after all those times of silence, they suddenly framed.

This was after YEARS of seeing I coming up with ideas and observing it in silence,

as I was rising up.

 

Only after they were incriminated seriously, after the poisoning chat was discovered,

after the enviromental change, they engaged in this sudden framing as a tactic.

 

And of course, you the authorities, cannot see the past of whats happened there and their stance, so they are gaslighting you right now.

 

You must ask the witnesses and you must try and digest all those times of silence and how that is impossible.

 

 

And of course,

 

There would be no evidence to their claims. Perhaps fronting something generic, but never about direct methods of my ideas.

And how on Earth, would I know this?

In all the years they claim to have come up with the idea to the moment I presented MY own idea, those are the years they could have used the idea for themselves, or discussed amongst themselves.

All those years. However many.

 

And you are telling me, somehow, I can predict that by luck?

That they won't have evidence of their claims. Direct method to my ideas being discussed in use of a third party server or record (even a chat)

Without first knowing I am innocent?

and being in the blind? Taking 'chances'? (That would be suicide)

Do not dehumanize and call me a "smooth criminal".

 

The only reason I can predict it with confidence, is because I know my ideas are my own.

And these people come up forcing themselves without a foresight as memory.

Of which would have provided the moment they came online.

And all that silence speaks the entirety as well.

 

This is history of framing.

As you have already seen.

And deadly lethal attempts as well.

 

 

The thing is this.

What they are aiming, seeing Steve's example.

 

Is that they are trying to get away from incrimination by framing me further.

Instead repent, they are attacking me in a zero-sum game.

Because they know, at the worst, is an ambiguity that is created, and if the law buys into that,

their actions somehow becomes justified.

 

Incorrect.

 

Every action that they are on pursuit of, AFTER what they have done.

Counts as PURSUIT OF HARM if without proper evidence to their claims.

And so-called ambiguity, works AGAINST THEM.

 

Nor does anything that they have done prior to existence of this channel itself,

such as that of the rat poisoning or using knives to try intimidating/killing me or attempting to harm my mother when she was recovering, and the husband gloating at my mother's death, just after she died and outside in the hospital in the car, can be excused.

Nor the defamation, nor the slander, nor the refund on my mother, nor the framing,

can be excused. It is intentional HARM.

 

And what the authorities are missing, is the past. That you did not research properly into.

Whats occured in the channel when they came up.

 

My sister was clearly cheering me on. As I was coming up with my ideas, but especially the space escalator. This was after MANY ideas. Like Steve's first major confession, this is the conversion point, their contradiction point that explains their motives and lies in the current time.

 

And all that they have done, aside from this, must be accounted for.

The law does not become susceptible to misleads. Fronting ambiguity, when the INTENT to harm has always been present. All those defamation, slander, character assassinations for YEARS, whilst in the channel, did not come with FRAMING on the ideas. They stood alone. Didn't it?

They changed the tactic after all those of silence.

Following Steve's example.

And I believe Wongi, the extended family has caught on to that tactic, and trying to gaslight you now. To try and get away from incrimination.

 

The law must first assess the intent of harm, and dehumanization factors here as well.

If framing on ideas were true, it would start off with that. Not cheering on my ideas as a supporter. Do you understand?

And what follows after are baseless accusations without evidence but persisting into harm.

Then you dismiss, and charge them for their actions.

 

As for this "what's eating gilbert grape" supporting me and mother financially for a while.

(Mom did very well until she was sick by the way, teaching art students)

it wasn't that long. And does it justify their rat poisoning or harming my mother?

 

The fucker, the husband is an LOWEST FUCKING SCUM. trying to make itself a hero.

Remember what its said in the car. Refer back to my statement. And what it admitted.

They are lowest of the low. Ok? It has a history of stealing my sound card as well I believe.

Which is uncalled for, I did not even know him back then when I was a teenager. Met him once or something.

These are culprits. together, my sister and the husband.

 

Everything my sister said, the husband was supporting it by default SILENCE.

as it was checking the channel with her everyday.

And so is the refund on my mom's account. as it was his money.

It knows what it has done with my sister as series of abuse. Attacking my mother, justifying her actions, and abusing me then as well. See what it had admitted in saying in the car.

So it had to pay. Or I would go insane.

 

Money, does not justify, INTENT for destructive harm.

And so is everything else that they have done.

 

 

 

 

It is quite simple.

Rat poisoning has no ambiguity. It is an deterministic action of harm.

And what followed in the channel, such as that of refund on my mom's account.

Is also deterministic action of harm.

As well as the character assassinations, and now the untimely framing.

Contradicting  their original stance.

This must all be accounted for as pursuit of harm.

That is exactly how the law must assess it.

I cannot be attacked with their unreasonable, without foresight, or credible records,

framing.

These people must be charged for.

 

 

If by chance, they are following up on my ideas and creating variations of it. While recognizing that I am the origin.

Then they are relying on the intentional harm with the politicians, trying to take advantage of their hostility towards my life.

And these people, like Biden, can simply try helping them. Discarding my first principles and my initiation. My foundation. As their 'enhancement' is better. This is called hijacking in a competition. As if open grounds. It is a lure, entrapment, and fraud.

If there is framing, stating they are the origin, like I said, it is but a baseless lie.

Either way, they must be charged.