I was living upstairs when I came up with the wooden ship.

Steve and I were not in speaking terms after fighting. (library genesis)

Only later briefly I spoke, in passive reconciliation.

Then I brought down my CNC trying to use their open space.

Only after I moved downstairs, I started telling Steve about my dealings with Adam.

It was 4 million per idea and possibly beyond. And that is the email you see. That I need to make my presentation(s).

Which includes my fishing ships. And once I am done to 'get out of his hair' because we are fighting / myself complaining so frequently. Over the door and what not.

I don't know how this guy is misdirecting.

But my wooden ships are NOT his idea.

If it were, it would confirm it over the emails as it knows I am talking to the investors, as I am talking about MY ships.

It lies.

That fabrication. It can only be isolated to itself. And untimely after years since the ships were mentioned and being used/developed in the open. Its stance was different. It was as it was helping me against the extended family on the sea platform and silent against Biden's comments on the ship. Functionality, and illegal migrants.

I would never know it is isolated to itself. Unless I know it is my idea.

Nor would it not remember this wooden submersible idea had it existed then. Same elements. It lies.

You need to confess Steve.  I didn't, I don't deserve your framing.

"Stewie exacts revenge on boy who stole his bike." (Screenshot again)

And no, like with the wooden submerines, there were novel concepts it tried stealing after my first series of ideas, which derived off the same elements. It just kept stealing the solutions when reminder would be present. Witnesses, I know it is hard to remember but please recall back on that.

First jumbo motorcycle, and its elements within. Starting off from monocycle, and trying to work around visivility and maneuver problem. Then passengers outside of the wheen, between 2 large ones. (4 actually as a pair for each) Diagrams were being made, interaction with Mr Musk, many ideas suggested.

Then about a year later, as Ariko's sister, Bonnie, was suggesting something, I changed the design by placing the vehicle to the flat on the ground, turning wheels into turbines within. Making it a flying vehicle. It stole on this novel concept I believe.

And then from atomic heart video scene, separate flying machine, lifting the vehicle itself. Removing the need for sharing same energy source or moving parts, increasing weight. I believe it stole this as well as a follow up.

If there is anything in-between, please check through my diagrams and recall on what Steve was trying to steal as a constant follow up.

 

 Authorities must understand, it is IMPOSSIBLE not to remember the wooden submersible, had it existed with Steve. Same method. Same materials. Wood + metal panels.

Nor are the follow ups of the jumbo motorcycle.

 

 

Seeing that screenshot, "Grape drink".

I like the flavor of this. What is this fucker getting at?

It is baseless dehumanization or accusation i'm guessing.

My words are based on reality. He is not, and repeating crimes that demands an explanation, that is escaped by use of dehumanization. Eccentricity. Which is impossible.

If it *didn't support me against the extended family on the sea platform follow up. Then my observation is incorrect. However, there must have been silences as acknowledgement as default or contradictions in its stance back then.

 

 

It lies. Endlessly.

 

 

 

Authorities must understand, even though even as these 'ambiguities' of origin is being detected as lies, as it follows up trying to steal what would be obvious reminder. (Wooden submersible, Jumbo motorycle and others)

These cannot be used as an excuse to alleviate its crimes.

Matter of fact is that it tried to kill me by framing. And in massivity of numbers of ideas, and it has confessed to this. It lingers with the few believing it can justify its actions by pushing on with the flaming, and Stallone I believe is saying "first blood".

No, there never was first blood from me. When it confessed the first time, it must have never mentioned theft of any kind to justify its actions as counter. Just its motivations itself. Witnesses please speak on that.

Nor why it would not confront me, and I am the who is confonting it as it runs from the scene at Walmart and others.

And as it does these things in repeat, it assigns dehumanization on to myself and itself. Constantly misleading by character assassinations.

As it howls in demented vanity, 'attraction/love' as it is trying to kill me in repeat with framing.

its beginning with the hate crimes fronting violence and its prejudice for years, only recently changed, confirming that violence was about "gay bashing".

This is a maniac on the loose attaching to my life as a parasite. It is lethal, and it will continue try killing me.

You must detect its contradictions in everything it does. Always invert and find evidences with the witnesses and logic of the situation at hand, in the house monitored, and out.

Please do not let this person continue destroying my life.  

 

 

---------

Unrelated.

Henry Cavill vs "bully Maguire"

and "it's not worth it."

this guy collaborating with my enemies.

I don't trust him.

He was playing both sides of the fence and asserting an image now on to encourage my attackers in a deceptive way? "It's not worth it"

who are you saying this to?

In belief of Steve? As you seen me go through the process of batman vs superman making of giant bikes?

I apologize if I got the relays wrong, but I don't think I am.

Please do not pretend to be an acquaintance/ friend.

 

Am also slightly threatened by this guy's looks,

but that is not what i'm getting at.

Image assertion as if they are the victim by saying "it's not worth it" is coming from solidified bias. And he is not in the position to do so as a bystander without an level of intent to make them look that way.

You should not speak in that tone, if you have.

 

 

"bully maguire bullies superman" (screenshot)

no i am not. stating what is fair and he should not be playing both sides of the fence, and then creating a sudden solidified bias. this is more intent to lopside into encouragement for the attackers by asserting an established tone. it is promotion in a passive way.

what resulted in this? were we competing?

is this guy seeing me as a competitor?

but he should be speaking from an neutral stance. not in this tone.

 

 

 

 

there is a good level of synergistic teamplay between the few key players.

such as that of biden, elon, even as elon supports.

it is a form of gaslighting.

authorities must see through that.

 

 

 

apologies to cavill if i got that wrong.

but i must speak out.

i don't want to be damaged by bias, celebrity influence.

 

 

outcome of punishment will be decisive after measuring all the things steve has done,

and all the things i have said.  differentiating what is fiction, what is fabrication, is what is alignment to reality.

 

one of us is lying.

that isn't me. but discounting my words in your belief, and measuring cold, hard, facts.

 

you list everything down. every facet. every motive. every confessions. every human fears and awareness.

 

you know steve is a lying scumbag, and its intent has been caught.

 

i do not need to be a reminder to the authorities, they already know this.

 

issue is that the public, constantly, willing become persuaded. even after in witness of what steve has done.

 

it is in your HOPES.

 

  I will not become a victim to your teamwork. There will be people who speaks the truth.

 There will be witnesses to what Steve has said and done.

 

 

--------

ah... to be able to urinate and defecate in my privacy...

such basic human rights and dignity is given to most. but not me.

fronting what? long resolved.

situation in what? that i am no danger.

but it has forced itself, biden and obama. endlessly.

when it wasn't necessary.

 you will be charged for all that.

 

 

and people. fuck. stop looking when i'm in the bathroom.

only means of psychological comfort is turning off the lights.

imagine my situation.

and how i am treated.

 

i kept seeing that from time to time (screenshot).

 

 

 

there are cameras in the hallways, everywhere.

why is my bathroom monitoring necessary?

and why can't that be done in privacy, why always public viewing?

and as Clark Wu that fucker tells mewhat its seen but refuses to help, gaslighting.

I hope it gets its share of punishment.

 

refute this in your right these  'presidents'.

god's going to cut you down.

what you did, public display.

you are fucked.

 

 

calling my mother "ice cream" and proceeding to destruction of facility,

and towards my mother as well personally,

cannot be bought into political excuse.

nor is this public display when i requested, in cooperation private viewing by the authorities then.

this is about CRUELTY. about attacking a person's MIND.

and image on to the public.

make this clear authorities.

 

alongside every other character assassinations and exploitation, propaganda, labeling.

how can you say this is not the abuse of the mind, torture?

attacks by the mob by ridicule and humiliation, creating that environment of targeting?

 

be clear about this authorities. actions speak louder than their words of excuse.

law accounts for actions, their words dismissed with alternate routes of choice.

actions resulting in outcome that is clearly in effect as well.

 

biden and obama must be gone.

 

keep at it. keep justifying yourselves in this subjugation.

it is not my blind faith in the law.

you people will be charged.

 

 

and you idiots. think about it.

why would i write anything that is incriminating towards me by handwriting, (there isn't any in the first place)

when i am being monitored and I am constantly aware of it?

every handwriting, it would be seen as movement. I don't know what you people see in detail or record.

if i remove anything, that is because prying eyes, trying to steal my ideas (though i haven't written much of it) and creating issues with legal matters i am praciticing before i present it on screen by the garbage can.

of which it happened before i believe people trying to steal stuff.

most all my ideas were presented live on screen without requiring any papers.

and you can clearly see that by my simulations in the mind, adapting to trial and errors.

it is doubt you create. prejudice to assert.

and if i must prove myself i will again in the future.

but my rights has to be given.

 

 

But to be fair, I had written notes praciticing my legal writing before I presented it to the screen before I knew I was being monitored by my movements, and got rid of them.

And that was a mistake I suppose. You can assign whatever you want in those papers I got rid of and create doubt.

However. Logic is clear.

----

01. There are no foresights as to what should be memory from Steve and others. There cannot be an group amnesia, let alone one.

02. The situation in the house, was in full awareness of the monitoring and contact. If there were ideas it would present it, and confirm it through me. And the emails showing Steve's inconsistency in his sayings, 2 months prior to its leave. If it was stating it was trying to convince me to present it to the investors and I thwarted it, why would I be trying to convince the reality of the situation still, that I am getting large investment?

03. And there are no records of third parties. How would I know this, but especially as, if it claimed my ideas existed with itself for long. And the new ideas with same elements, reminders it cannot forget had it existed.

04. Nor its lack of confrontation, and I am the one confronting it of theft at Walmart, and its confession, major one that followed.

----

 

Dehumanization is a lie.

We are confined by the rules of human condition, human emotions.

We have fears, we have envy, we have wants and fair exchange, we have awareness.

 

Not presenting or confirming its ideas to me in the house as it knows we are monitored = impossibility.

Nor any group amnesia.

Nor lack of third party records. But especially if lengthened duration. And untimely presented as fabrication. And how I would know about that being in the blind, and fearless as to what I present.

 

 

--------

So I think where we are heading towards is this.

Steve has already admitted to framing in massivity of ideas.

But isolated few he is trying to steal, still. In order to justify its crimes.

If I am correct.

 

Those two cannot correlate.

I don't want to write this way. But in order to further protect myself I must use the fullest application of the law in the fair way. There were no ideas from Steve told on to me, but if it were:

1. If someone tells another person of his idea, without a third party background as record,
and this person uses that idea and presents it to the third party, the accontability befalls on to the teller. (01)

But especially, when he is stating that he knew about the situation of monitoring, and investor network and I am constantly scolding him by the emails. That he would not have the awareness to confirm his ideas? This falls in alignment to dehumanization and therefore LIE. (02)

But let's discount 02 for a moment and focus on 01.

If the theft is going on by me, and I happened to present it before the third party. And I am blind, unknowing as to what it has presented before myself, or as records. Then I am risking myself of the dangers. I am not framing a person, I would be 'thieving'.

(Risking oneself, unless he is suicidal, itself is however is in alignment to honesty).

 

However, what I am trying to point out is that, I am not in control. At all. Being in the blind.

And therefore I am not the one who is framing. At the very worst, would be exploitation of accountability, of having been 'told' an idea. (Of which is also impossible, unknowing as to what this person may hold as records in his past.) When this guy is stating I was presenting ideas that was told on to me by him? Why would it not confirm to my emails?

And why would I assume that he will enter the channel, asking him to give me the link if he ever does? Why would it twist a hate crime and mugging as if it was something 'collaborative'? To what end? My own incrimination?

If I am risking myself to steal from him, unknowing as to what he may hold as records? And if he is saying he told me he never have any records, would I be able to trust that? No. It is simply impossible. It is dehumanization. The fear factors would be immense.

The bottom line is that, he KNOWS there is monitoring going on. And investors watching. And even at the passive assumption that investors may or may not exist. (As all I can prove to him are the relays not the channel itself) There are no reasons WHY it would give me its idea for free. Why would it? And all the so-called "thwarting" is a lie under the knowing the investors are there. But if it is saying it just told this idea to me without believing in the investors. That too is a lie. It would at least confirm. Nor would I be the one confronting it at Walmart. Nor would it not confirm with me when it was 30 meters away from my house, when it moved into a new one. And from that new house, it ran off again within 2 weeks.

Everything it does, is about attacking from distance, gaslighting the mass. The public.

Sorry I got sidetracked and lost the point of this writing.

My point is this:

The accountability would entirely fall on to him,

and there are no justifications for lethal framing that was designed to obliterate a life.

 

So despite the fact that it is impossible, without dehumanization of basic human emotions.

Even at trying to justify its actions under "first blood", it does not justify an deadly intent of massivity of framing, of hate crimes using violence, of character assassinations, and continued attachment for destruction.

And no, there are no ideas taken by me from Steve. I am writing this to differentiate, even at the worst of assumptions favoring Steve, (there really cannot be, not after all this) Steve cannot be justified of his actions.

 

---------

Writing in circles. Waste of time. Did I write anything new to solve the case? I hope the authorities will come to a conclusion. If not already.

 

 

All the delays I have with my chores, is this situation, constantly writing and defending myself. (And lack of money) And trying to convey the truth through logic. And trying to uncover Steve's relentlessly harmful intent. That is held in madness and vanity, for self-preservation at the cost of my life.

 

All it does is creating doubts in the end. It is content creation.

And authorities must differentiate what is fact from fiction.

What requires dehumanization to lie, (fair exchanges knowing monitored, confirming itself through emails, and no memories as to foresight)

What does not require any dehumanization but being straight-forward.  (my fear factors are always present as I am in the blind)

So I apologize writing similar logic with perhaps a hint of new clarity I am hoping to awaken you to.

But repetition is key to new understandings.

So I hope Steve's and his acolytes, their intentions are clear.

 

I really am innocent in all this. Did no wrong in this competition.

Every idea I presented was mine.

 

And I am being targeted for the money, for their preservation.

I cannot be a victim to that.

 

 

--------------------

Ok. What's the next thing to do. Exhausted after writing.

I need to clean off some DVDs and sell them.

I have to pay off cashmoney loan (98) to borrow 170.

Then buy equipment this month.

I have 83 total. So almost there.

 

 

"Sandman confesses"

If you are going to confess, confess fully.

End all this.

 

 

 

 

 

-----------

Does your confession mean your death Steve?

Or is it in fact, your path to live?

 

Once you fully confess and show that you are no longer harm,

you will live.

 

If otherwise, they already know your intent and how you go about all this.

You are gaslighting, and asserting impossible qualities on to yourself and myself to be able to convince that.

It is not going to work.