Judging by the relays, Adam is stating these idiots, Laura and others are copycatting, creating variations of my ideas as a follow up now and trying to hijack it.

"Lauren explained something that I hadn’t realized. Perhaps some of you hadn’t either. There are fungus-growing ants who take organic objects to their nests and allow time for fungus to grow on the object. It is the fungus they eat rather than the object itself."

Innovation is where I begin. If without myself they would not be following up. And further, if this is after they tried framing me for the origins and now is hijacking, it's still the pursuit of harm without remorse for their actions. It is because the environment permits it.

There are politicians and idiots trying to turn the competitive environment into a open business affair, when in reality, I am in the blind being exploited to bits. When I was lured into a competition.

No follow ups are allowed. Only towards the investors and their R&D team.

What these people are doing is INSISTING pursuit of harm. Being parasites to my life. It must be accounted for.

If they could, they'd come up with their own thing instead trying to understand my innovation, my principles, rules, and creating a variation from that. This is trying to leverage on my foundation, and it is there to try and flip the table.

From where they begin, this is criminal. Make no mistake about that. First trying to frame, next trying to hijack. Does the intent to destroy somehow go away when they changed their direction? Framing becomes hijacking, and does the deeds from previous go away?

No. It does not.

It is continued pursuit of harm, suppressing conscience and hoping for a turnover from their conviction by illusion of 'skill', so they would be revered instead shunned. Is that it?

No. Their deeds DO NOT go away.

How the court misses on this, their criminal intent. I don't know.

They are convicted at the HEIGHT of their crimes. When partially confessed to the majority, but still remaining to few, which is now also caught in repeat.

And trying to still latch on, trying to hijack my ideas.

They haven't learned a thing. These are criminally wired people.

Charges must proceed to its fullest extent.

Again. Everything is already caught. They use impossible eccentricity and dehumanization to support their lies. When they know everyone is being monitored, and stating they knew about the investors and presented  to me thus, there is no way in hell, by being HUMAN, that they would not confirm this towards the audience or myself within the house had their been ANY ideas from them.

Nor, foresight as memory. Records with the third party with the past. They create stories. Baseless. It's because fucker's like Biden is willing to lopside to their advantages NO MATTER WHAT. As you can see that always. They are riding on the environment of targeting.

These are their value system. It is permitted in their minds to destroy another person for their gain. They are convicted at the height of their crimes. And partial confessions, only to proceed into further harm, and repeating offense, does not count as confession of remorse and cease of pursuit of harm. Therefore their lenience by the partial confession is DISMISSED.

 

I get the court, tries to be lenient as much as possible.

But this is not the way. This is fraud.

Please do not exploit my blindness.

You are creating cycles of abuse by that lenience.

They must be charged at the height of their intent.

And all this must be accounted for as pursuit of harm.

Apologies if I am speculating wrong on your lenience.

 

 

And you saying "be the miracle" as in myself getting in there without your help,

due to people being convicted and your moral stance states that getting me in there is their incrimination is ALSO FRAUD.

The law is about delivering justice. You are then encouraging crime and cycles of it.
And dismissing their deeds with your own value sets.

Why are you there in the first place?

Why does the court exist?

DO NOT tell me that.

 

"Be the miracle" (Screenshot)

Don't tell me that.

That's not in your jurisdiction to make preference.

You are part of the law and acting as part of the law.

Don't forget that.