"They voted to delete you. -the richest bloodlines held a private summit to erase your identity."

 

Why would they have a 'vote' in the first place? In the court of law?

Are they above the law?

 

And what if I come up with 1000 ideas over time?

If you are both interested and threatened by a handful,

what will you do in the future?

 

Do you block out the Sun?

 

These people have no say in my basic human rights, authorities.

What is this?

 

 

Not to sound self-serving,

Obviously, I wasn't meant to be stuck in here.

I am meant to change the world with correct partnership.

And to avoid people like this. Constantly trying to exploit.

 

I am, by significance of that,

above your petty attempts to control a life by your bias and prejudice.

 

If they are stating I am 'danger',

All ideas are a double-edged sword. For any intellect.

But it is up to the correct people and correct partnership,

we think ahead and apply better.

 

Why humanity is doing better free from limitations.

Who are you to block progress of civilization and what it offers?

These people are criminals, to be even suggesting this.

 

Who do they think they are?

 

 

I am not their slave.

and I will not stop coming up with ideas.

I would be monitored and dissected for life,

they will justify this,

as they justify my subjugation.

 

Once you try to control a person over his mind,

They will continue to do so.

What they propose, is forfeit of every right.

 

To use my ideas for their benefit, their freedom, their theft = their privilege.

For me to have any control = is their threat.

 

You are not blocking anything out.

You are redirecting to control.

Their intent is clear.

 

This is a heinous attempt to control.

And these people should be charged for even suggesting they have the right.

It is right over a person's life, as he helps.

 

The worst of all ideas that were double-edged swords,

such as that of nuclear bombs and nuclear energy was asserted by a singular person.

Was this person subjugated?

 

Or was the idea assessed and filtered as a tool?

Why partnership exists, and why announcement of idea = no danger.

If to state my ideas will be done in my privacy,

and this poses danger over my growth.

That is entirely your attempt to control.

My status will be in public. As it ALREADY is.

There is no anonymity once the person is identified.

 

So further subjugation is suggesting what is beyond the law.

To breach it, in order to apply criminal control.

 

These people belong in prison.

 

Correct partnership means a filter.

Announcement means a plan is set.

Public status and identification means there is transparency.

 

The real danger is setting someone in this situation and barring contact.

Then anyone can monitor my activities, take my ideas to open source,

and in THEIR control, in THEIR privacy, there we have an issue.

 

What you suggest to subjugate my life,

in fact, causes the opposite effect in harm.

 

So these idiots are trying to subjugate by creating narratives that in fact, IS harm.

I am trying to cooperate with society as they suggest AGAINST it.

There is a reason why civil order exists and the process that follows.

 

My subjugation, in effect, IS MY autonomy that they fear.

Fucking idiots.