seeing stallone's first blood again.

nope. every blood belongs to steve.

first is that it revived itself to framing when i wasn't even on pursuit of this fucker's incrimination.

i thought it was just over after its confession. i was minding my own business working with elon.

and i believe this occurred before my suggestion on its capital punishment with the hate crimes that was endless.

 

the repercussions of that revival, is as the stakes were increasing.

being framed for my presentation. death penalty was asserted.

being framed by anna. death penalty was asserted.

if i was the one who misled the origins of my work, in that massivity of number,

my value plummets. no prospects of the throne. rightfully, there cannot be protection.

as others are getting in complications, becoming convicted to setting me in this lockdown, and i am essentially framing them, by being a fraud.

by aiming for the investment or rewards that would not belong to me.

and steve's previous framing would also be understood as my attempt to frame him. and the supporters of steve would too get in trouble because of me.

and whichever other reasons.

 

secondly,

if it fronts my suggestion to capital punishment and my threats as a way to justify its attacks,

see that i have only been reacting, and this the reality:

my suggestion to capital punishment based on the hate crime, the outcome is determined by the authorities. only ever based on existing deeds by steve.

and my threats? this is obviously after it is trying to destroy me endlessly, and in endless variations. it is escalating, and it won't stop. it is more of a warning, for self-protection against this maniac.

i have stated that no capital punishment is necessary if it fully confesses and shows no more intent to harm. it didn't. even after i stated this, it went on pursuit of trying to kill me by framing. and that was confessed after i've given it options.

 

 

---------

And again even IF these creation of doubt, the remaining ambiguity were true, (it is not)

it does not justify its actions of intent to destroy the victim, as it would be its own responsibility of negligence.

(and no, it is impossible what it says, house was monitored and the fucker is in full awareness of that. it would confirm had there been ideas)

 

 

----------

So bottom line is that, it went on pursuit of destruction of my life,

no matter what options were given. and partially confessed thereafter of its intent to kill,

but still goes on pursuit of harm. even after that partial confession.

and then it partially confessed again.

but it is not because of my retaliation, it has tried obliterating me with or without it by its initiation. it was suicidal vanity and intent to harm. a zero-sum game and torture.

its contradictions range from vigilantism, jealousy, political espionage, self-protection,

and it still goes on with pursuit of harm.

do you really believe this person will stop?

if it confesses fully, and swears never to do so again, then no capital punishment.

but it won't. it wants a zero-sum game. it wants to turn the table around by framing.

and it just wants to destroy my life in various ways by torment, attachment.

it is a devotion to harm.

and authorities must not support its creation of doubt by baseless lies,

rather see its repeating offense and its unending intent to destroy my life.

 

 

 

 

 

 

but it doesn't matter. it is as reaction to its attacks, and it is verbal. the person who is making the threat is saying so upfront. so to have it stop.

and even as the threats may be real, though conceptual, it is still based on its existing attacks that won't stop.