waking up to realize... if I am correct,

did you let my sister and her husband go?

after all their attempts?

what is that?

they stand on basis of rat poisoning my food.

artificial, man-made chemical designed to kill an mammal.

there are no excuses for that.

and their repeating intent to harm has been shown throughout this channel.

please read back on my statement.

when people do something like that and they continue going on pursuit of harm.

you cannot dismiss this.

their actions are NOT based on any 'need', as they so may claim.

you must differentiate what is vanity and cruelty,

to attacks on basis of need.

pre-emptive attacks by poison, while I am living separately means there cannot be an urgency of need of any kind. if they are making me into the aggressor. the act is also based on exploiting trust. giving someone their food.

second, the nature of what they done here were also exploitation based on knowing I am in the blind and they believed they held the control. defamation, slander, assertion of identity,
attempted harm on to mother, attempted framing and theft. and if they are trying to get away by creating doubt where there is no answer to, like Steve, the law must see that they stand on grounds of endless deceit. it must be accounted for as pursuit of harm.

and further, like Steve, their actions are unrelated to any 'ideas'. it is standing alone from their cruelty. hate crimes are hate crimes. and so are the attacks. i do not want to keep using
this analogy, because it makes me look weak. but logically, because people seem to be confused i say this. not because I am guilty or anything like that. but if people have spoken
an idea towards another person, whilst they hold no credible third party records, it means
their actions falls into their responsibility/accountability. their lethal attempts to destroy a person does not justify. (furthermore, every idea is indeed mine and they are technology orientated with a solution, with stated triggers of the ideas from relays of others, and my re-tries of my first attempts, to reach a better solution, or enhancement. it has nothing to do with them) so their actions must be accounted for separated from using 'once was in physical proximity' so to use this as a factor of creation of doubt. the nature of their attacks unrelate. and it must also be seen as pursuit of harm standing on their endless deceit.

and same thing as Steve, no foresight, only a follow up. and their actions stand on repeating offense of deceit. they are all jealous fucks, aiming at destruction of a person for money & fame.

 

 

---------

the fact has been always clear. my isolation and blindness invites abuse.

as i am mocked, laughed at with the public display, and they exploit how pathetic I look with creation of doubt.

 

 

but i have of course proven myself infinitely. but i don't think you've kept track.

the process of all this. i don't know.

 

 

but to summarize, their incrimination points are not about creation of doubt over my ideas.
that, when they aim for ambiguity where there cannot be an answer to,
the law must see that they stand on grounds of infinite deceit and framing,
and secondly, even if it were true (which is not) they are wholly accountable for their negligence. responsibility befalls on to them, and their attacks to destroy another human being does not justify. so please differentiate.

 

also, please stop demonizing me.

i have either tried to save, or be in civility, giving my attackers a chance to stop their attacks.

they do not.

I have tried to save Anna and the gang, multiple times DESPITE what they did on to me.

And what followed next was insinuation of death penalty on to me, by their framing,

or by the presentation (for the website).

This is fundamentally where it escalated, people following up on the targeting and leveraging these attacks to further try destroying me.

It became a 'political' zero-sum game.

Whereas I am but a victim to your citizens by cyberbullying, both civilians and government actors alike.

Whereas I hold no control, and I am in the blind. Just trying to participate in the competition
YOU initiated.

And as I do, you people try and change my identity itself to try and dismantle my efforts.

I am not the blame. At all.

If you are convicted, that is by the assessment of the authorities. By their observation.

Of which, if I can, I will try and lessen those charges.

But law is the law. I am not the blame, but your intent to manipulate and affect a target.

 

 

Fuck off Mr Musk. That relay on Darth Vadar.

You are the evil. I am only ever defending myself.

(and leaving it on to the law)

 

 

Ok. So waking up at 4pm today.

It is now 5:24pm.

Need to meditate on things to do today.

And carry it out.

 

 

 

------

By the way, if Elon fucking Musk, tries to make my ideas open source, public.

This is abetting, if I am using the word correctly.

He initiated the competition and made me participate,

showed reciprocation and interaction,

assigned the rewards,

only for him to try changing the ownership of my ideas.

The basis of foundation for any innovation that follows thereafter,

is first from my ideas. My innovation.

So if he is doing that,

like with EVERYTHING else,

this person is DESPERATE to see me fall, fail, and die.

He must be charged.

 

Apologies if this particular speculation is wrong on Elon Musk.

 

 

It's like this fucker is doing everything to lessen my power.

And this is by becoming the alpha and the omega of my life.

Who made this fuck the decider?

No, you don't listen to this person with the wrong intent.

After all the series of things he's done.

He is the LAST person on Earth you should be listening to.

 

 

Elon Musk's ill-intent towards my life has already been figured out.

Please understand.

 

What he does, is borderline lunacy to control, and self-justify.

He's EVIL.

 

Please do not give this person power over my ideas.

Nobody has that right. What the fuck.

Who made this guy the decider over my ideas?

To make it open source?

 

 

Only I GET TO DECIDE THAT.

 

 

Remember that if you care for your economy,

and predictability over the intent of use of my ideas from others,

you cannot simply make it open source.

that is chaos.

you don't know what people will do with my ideas.

start a war with another nation as they find prosperity?

I don't know.

If you have the power to distribute, and I gave you permission for that,

in fair exchange, on the business side (which hasn't commenced yet)

and in agreement of honoring the competition and its merit of humanitarian efforts.

that in turn, exchange for rewards. (the two must be kept separate, competition and business)

then you distribute in that control, in safety.

you do not get to bully aiming at this singular person.

i am always the fucking threat in these people's petty fucking minds.

while they cause all the chaos because they think that way.

fucking jealous fucks.

 

profit generated from commencement of business is taxable income.

this hasnt happened yet. nothing was developed or applied in practice.

 

right now it stays in the realm of competition, and rewards for the ideas in its implication of effect, the humanitarian merit.

so two are separate by nature.

 

 

elon musk is a diabolical leprechaun.

a trickster genie/djinn that grants wishes with a serious damage on to the person.

this is his entire value on 'jealousy' stating "nothing is ever easy."

nothing he does is just CLEAN.

it's fucking filth.

deliberately trying to create obstacles for the person HE BROUGHT IN and adhered to,

he wants to see him crippled.

If you can't see that intent, after all that he's attempted doing.

You need to see it clearly.

Nothing he does is NECESSARY.

He can simply be clean.