01. Sequence. Need. Before and after.
*Find through email.
02. Wall.
03. Confession from Steve/adaptation.
04. Reason why. "Beethoven virus".
05. Stated issue at the time.
06. Emails of the situation/monitoring/investor.
07. Before & after. Find. E6400. Sept.2021.
08. Dehumanization. Character assassination. Repeating offense.
09. Further.
Going to list my designs and the main 'shapes' I used. (Writing how it came to be, my thought processes as I designed them, there were other designs from different industries that went in between, prior or after these ones) I will try and list most relating designs to each other, and events that led to it. 1. Zero gravity manufacturing. 3D laser sintering with processed 'powdered' metal in orbit. The idea was to connect interlocking cubes inside a cylindrical rocket. Release them to form a hollow 'courtyard'. So for the ship being built, to latch on to as it is being built, incrementally. Each of the cubes to contain 3D laser sintering printer. However, here began the issue. It was too expensive to transport the material in orbit. (Main shape: Square/Cubes) 2. Space Elevator. This needed revision over and over again. As the initial understanding of gravity was wrong, (was thinking the rocket itself, if having enough mass in orbit, would have enough gravitational 'pull' of its own, to hold the 'rope'. Mr.Musk I believe later relayed Earth's gravity was too strong) so was the friction/drag during launch. Revised with, liquid nitrogen cooled magnets inside a tunnel, so to levitate during launch. Removing drag. Added jet engines to the sides of the 'rope' incrementally, climbed up by tracks on the rope-line, once rocket is holding itself in orbit. So to sustain itself in air fed by electric current. The other unused sides to the 'rope' were to have drones climbing up to transport processed powder. (Main shape: Circle/Cylinder) 3. Spherical spaceship. The idea was to keep the sphere(s) rotating wrapped around a rod, through ball bearings, much like a fidget spinner to simulate artificial 'gravity'. The rod itself hollow, to be used as transport between spheres. This to be built with zero gravity manufacturing. As the shape itself would be difficult to launch to orbit, unless transported inside a rocket. (Main shape: Circle/Sphere) 4. 'Elevator' was questionable. Still fighting against gravity. Too many components, temperature, unseen variables of error. Instead, the initial top-down approach, as done with the elevator, relying on mass of the rocket, thought about reverse, bottom-up approach. A brief passing thought on a 'stairway to heaven' was revived having played with CAD prior. Cubes were aligned, incrementally increasing in height. Diagonally cut. Thought about adding sides for stability. Decide to build on it, automate the process. Added tracks, and cutting machines. Following tracks to drop the cubes, to lock between cubes, front and to the sides. Revised with extra components, more tracks and functions dedicated. (Main shape: Square/Cubes) You will see from the first draft; it is very rudimentary in design and full of errors. (Which indicates I am drawing this on the fly, with improvisation to solutions as I go) Making side tracks to the main lane, instead creating tracks top-down, fights against gravity. Creating unnecessary steps and stress on the machines. You can see from the sentence structure, I am thinking on-the-fly. After the fundamental idea is conceived in my mind, I draw it on CAD, as I did LIVE, on-screen with the sea platform construction tools. But they were incomplete, requiring additional solutions. Hence, in the revision.pdf, you will see these side slopes have been raised above the point of transition from the main lane, making it easier to install tracks, and the side tracks have disappeared. It is now simpler; you simply drop the cubes matching the same height as previous. And it no longer fights against gravity being on top of a solid base below, while carrying very heavy cubes) These are critical improvisations. Had it came from a place of completion, would I be correcting myself? This was done during the times, if i'm correct, Mr.Musk was too, devising a enhanced design after the first presented idea. Someone relayed, my revised version was more realistic? If I can recall. We were sort of competing. (Competitive attitude was Mr.Musk's idea, I had nothing but respect for him and was just trying my best) I have no idea what Robert presented. But note that it can only come *after my ideas. As so has Steve. So i'm guessing they were trying to improve or enhance on it. My ideas, all of it, comes from a place of simplicity. It is built from trial and error, and enhanced from what is fundamentally correct, but not quite functional when I came up with it. So I would say my further proof, is in my *evolving. Its process, and repetition of component usage and goals. (Tracks, transport) Main shapes: (Square/Cubes) 5. I have presented the idea of geothermal energy before in the beginning. But not until recently, I wasn't able to simplify the process. Only with the Sea platform, the screw-on and detaching idea, (as would hollow circular saw for trees) came to be, and I applied the idea again, on geothermal. But prior to this, I suggested the idea of diagonal dig and vertical dig (mix), by boring machines. So to build a underground habitat in Mars. This was to to avoid radiation. Later suggested to create a magnetosphere using lasers, to protect. Main shapes: (Circle/Cylinder) And these are about space. You will see, many things I designed share similar shapes in a different industry. Greenscreen pillars (Square/Cubes), Recreational Vehicle, space-in-space design, (Rectangle/Cubes), Ejection compartments on collision (Rectangle/Cubes), multi-monitor (Rectangle, stacked up, folded) etc. You will also see that these shapes are about 'extension', incrementally building up, stacked up to each other. Indicating usage of sketchup, surface protrusion feature, and scaling in number.
Additionally, more recent example are the interlocking cubes for marine-life preservation (presented with screenshots in Sketchup),
prior to this, connecting idea were cubes for the ship, which is included as screenshots in the website presentation (long ago) of which
I revised again, as it did not meet the safety regulations. I improved the design with inner supporting skeleton beams as frame,
and dropping interlocking hollow cubes for buoyancy, eliminating the supporting rods connected to the ground as in the presentation.
Hence possible to be built in water. Not all of the ideas were drawn with Sketchup. A lot of it was quickly drawn in 2D paint as the ideas came,
to quickly convey a message. Greenscreen pillars, (formerly just protruding pillars to quickly build volume for filming sets), were drawn in
Sketchup and screenshot as well. I went back and forth with 2D and 3D. If it needed more details and could not be drawn in 2D or be
explained clearly in text, I used Sketchup. So what i'm saying is, my thought process is about incrementally building up things, stacking
them up, scaling. Most ideas I have connect in this pattern and it is where I began in mechanical related designs. However, I hope to
design something more sophisticated in the future. :)