What is that relay? "Dudeplomacy" between Obama and Trudeau,

"thanks for making that possible".

 

Made what possible? Setting me in this situation of lockdown by joint effort?

Taxing a contest that is ideas for rewards, that was set by Elon's personal wealth,
and personal values,

and that no business has commenced, nor the profit generated from it.

and the two must be separated and categorized the first exchange as a 'gift'?

 

Helping people by making me into the sacrifice, isn't correct.

I am stating my rights.

And the rights that must be understood after their abuse to control.

Why isn't Trudeau charged? If for its previous attempts to subjugate and take by the whole?

Unrelated to taxes?

What the fuck is this court? That never differentiates but dilutes in mix with everything?

 

All must be clearly differentiated.

Now I apologize to President Obama if his intent is better.

However, there is no good news coming from alliance with my enemy, that is Trudeau.

Its attempt to control then befalls on to President Obama as well.

President Obama definitely has helped me.

And most of these heinous actions stems from Biden.

However, further attempts to control, at my sacrifice, a 'greater good',

demands accountability for the initiation in alliance with Trudeau, that is subjugation of myself towards your output of control.

Whatever this "dudeplomacy" is.

 

 

Thereby, if President Obama, tried making me into the sacrifice for 'greater good'

of which I can  expect from his askewed sense of morality.

Which is my sacrifice, with an given 'adequate' share. By his perspective.

Thinking both Canada and I, get something out of it.

That's his 'greater good'. I won't stand for that. That is CLEARLY CONTROL.

 

And he pushes for taxes, alongside alliance with Trudeau.

Then his alliance in the beginning with Trudeau, for my subjugation must be accounted for.

It is stemming from arrogance. These people trying to control.

 

And no, there cannot be taxes to what is an exchange for IDEAS to rewards by personal initiation. That is not corporate, not business. But strictly ideas for rewards in an contest assigned by personal values and personal wealth that never translated into an entity.
It is from an INDIVIDUAL.

That must be differentiated with business. Business hasn't commenced, yet. Nor the profit generated from it.

This is theft.

 

And furthermore, I think these idiots are trying to mix Trudeau's attempts for TOTAL control and taking over the money with taxation and the falling situation in commonwealth.

And trying to let Trudeau go. Laughing at my face.

Aiming for taxation is one thing.

Aiming for total FUCKING CONTROL over the money, the rewards, excluding me from it.

IS A CRIME.

THAT CANNOT BE FORGIVEN OR DILUTED TO THIS REASONING.

YOU FUCKING CUNTS.

 

Obama and Trudeau these fuckers are trying to get away with CHARM.

I stated this yesterday. Its excuses for economic downfall in commonwealth or Canada,

has NOTHING to do with Trudeau's attempts for TOTAL DOMINATION OF CONTROL OVER MY LIFE.

 

And that INTENT MUST BE CHARGED FOR.

That includes Obama, if his alliance with Trudeau resulted in this,

then the beginning must be accounted for as well.

 

 

These idiots are just charming their way and in and out of crimes.

Authorities must clearly differentiate.

They just laugh at the situation that would result in devastation on to my life,

and dimisses each other's crimes. Just like that.

Inserting narratives that does not justify their actions. In fact, those excuses

ONLY AMPLIFIES attempt to harm AT MY SACRIFICE.

 

 

 

------

I will comeback to the rest of the points.

 

 

-------------

Now I obviously do not want to incriminate president Obama.

That is not my 'intent'.

Rather I am trying to be fair on this.

Misdirecting Trudeau's crime for total subjugation under any 'higher motives' or 'greater good'. Neverminding my sacrifice and suffering to it.

That callousness is a crime.

Now I apologize if that wasn't by president Obama but if dialogues were misdirected deliberately, laughing about it. Then that must be questioned as control by arrogance.

 

 

I think that there were help from President Obama to myself. And I should be grateful for that.

Such as, fighting against Biden, when he was attacking the facility or my mother.

Or, trying to transfer me into presidency.

 

However. What I cannot accept, is corruption getting away under false premise of 'greater good'. Or even if that greater good is genuine, it is callously attempted over my suffering.

And protection to Trudeau is unacceptable. Nor any cooperation.

And that initial motivation in alliance with Trudeau should be questioned.
If it was indeed by arrogance of control.
For the greater good. But my rights sacrificed.

Yes, I believe President Obama, as I defended him long ago, he meant what is better for me.

But if that better comes with a price on my rights... That would indeed be assigned by his arrogance. And that is where I am getting at.

I can drop the charges to president Obama  if there is one to charge. Give and take, he was trying to raise me up.

However, I cannot accept compromising over evil and unreasonable force, that was Trudeau.   

 

And secondly, that misconception of 'greater good' at someone's sacrifice, is in alignment to the taxes as well. That this deliberate lack of differentiation to contest to business.

Where Elon has initiated a contest for ideas for rewards. And that is standalone.

And business is business. These two are separate reward system. Separate exchange system.

To save Canada, I cannot be the sacrifice. But especially after what Canada has done to me.
In this psychological torment, and following absolute subjugation for control over the rewards by Trudeau. Despite my refute, and its criminal attempts to try continue control, extending the U.S court, despite they will come to a ruling, to further create complicatons in Canada.

(As it asserted this before as well I believe, fronting doubt created by Steve) It is heinous attempt to destroy my life and to control it no matter what. That intent was revealed when I refuted, stated my rights, and it went at it despite.

To accept the rewards on my behalf, means the crime is already resolved by the law. But to extend that law is to attempt subjugation by its control. And besides this particular thing, it tried to convince the cabinet members to rewrite the law to accept the money on my behalf. As I am in the blind. (This is BEFORE it suggested the extension of ruling by the court carried to Canada) So both attempts were about CONTROL. Trying to subjugate my rights AFTER receiving the money. Which would be after the ruling of the U.S court. And before that, trying to accept it anyway as well. As I win. Without an excuse to create doubt with extended ruling.

Both attempts are heinous by nature. It was framing and setting me in slavery. Treating me like human garbage. And stating its exchange system by itself as well contradicting itself to these attempts. Stating, that the money is for 'protecting' me against my allegations.

This impossible arrogance, and EVIL. Must be accounted for.

But to try dismissing this as if it were for greater good?

As it tried to bash someone into framing and slavery, controlling the outcome of the law,
and justifying an exchange.

 

Trudeau has committed and attempted, impossibly heinous crimes.

It must be charged.

 

Hey, Chritiano Ronaldo. I am reading "Let it go. Past is past."

Heinous crime cannot be forgiven.

Intent to destroy a person cannot be forgiven.

This is embedded in the very nature of these people.

The very few of them.

And the dangers exist. So as long as they roam free.

Or exist.

There are things you can let go.

Like Mr Gates harassment comparing himself to my situation with my 'former' (Ariko) with his personal life. It just so happens to mirror his own life or something in cheating. As I writing to Ariko. No. First,  Ariko and I don't know each other very well at all. We were never acquainted, and spoke once passively. And this is reverse gender. Female roles and male roles are different. And Mr Gates comparing himself and being angry at it, as I have no choice but to speak out on Ariko, was weird. And I think he was trolling. I got a little mad at the end as well.

But I think this was about, him trying to sacrifice me for greater good as my methods were to be examined and people to mimic. These are mistakes. And he corrected himself on that with empathy to my situation. So these things are not that big of a deal. Misinterpretation of the situation and taking lightly on my suffering. He didn't mean destruction over my life.

 

But others. The few others. THAT is different.

 

Mr Gates I think changed his stance. And even as he was on pursuit of that particular harm, he ultimately wanted the better for me, correct? So he shouldn't be charged.

I think he wanted my freedom and for me to win. So it's just a small mistake he made.

 

It was essentially framing me for control. And subjugating my rights with its tyranny by misusage of power.

And president Obama, should not be callous about my individual suffering. As I mentoned long ago, "comforting a baby crying" is not the way to go about things. My suffering counts.
And accountability must exist on that front as well.

 

 

Please analyze, in order, what Trudeau has done.

From beginning to end.

No excuses will suffice.

It was all intent to control and subjugate.

The U.S court extension to Canada (after the ruling and after receiving the money because of that ruling) was an adaptation to its initial attempt to take the money.

In the beginning it was stating control over the money as an assigned exchange for protection.

Both these reasons are heinous by nature.

It was about subjugation and control.

Framing under guise of the law that is already concluded.

And slavery under assigned exchange by itself.

Trudeau must be charged.

 

Wasn't Mr Petersen helping me against Trudeau at the time?

Try reviving those arguments as well.

Trudeau's tyranny extends beyond myself. Towards Mr Petersen and others.

People should speak out on Trudeau's character and how that is crime.