And for all, I gave them a chance for civility. When they go on pursuit of harm despite,
relentless pursuit of lethal harm. I have the right to defend myself, though the assessment of their deeds and the outcome of the law is by the authorities. And they will most likely do the right thing as well knowing how they systematically target my life in synergy.
And that it continues.
Though I also question how susceptible they are to their excuses...
And why I am constantly required to fight against it.
But I will have faith.
You should have seen enough.
Apologies for my aggressive tone.
I do not mean to antagonize the Royal family if they are the ones who said this.
If you are joking, please do not do that in the court of law.
I do everything I can possibly can, to protect myself against their attacks.
On the receiving end, knowing my innocence, I know what they are.
"Why they fired Aragorn."
I don't mind.
If you do not agree with me, that is fine also.
But do not try to turn the table on me.
At that point that is your malice.
"Kira isn't gay. IDK his identity tho."
First is that this fucker used its prejudice with violence, attempting to subjugate, fronting its brother. If it denies involvement, *it wasn't stopping its brother during the mugging and they appeared together attacking at the same time. It was a premeditated act in unity.
Rest of the actions are follow ups to justify its prejudice.
It is clearly a heinous hate crime, alongside with everything ELSE it has done.
It is there to be a parasite on to my life and attacking it knowing the devastating consequences of its actions.
Second, those years attempting to assassinate my character based on its prejudice,
is only a confirmation of that violation. That it wasn't a made up thing, but it actually held a prejudice. Hence that is a hate crime.
Thirdly, this prejudice was asserted on to the public for years, in serious connotations. Even as I gave out my statement on my identity. Any person with better intent, do not go on pursuit of this stating "sovereignity" of its right to 'protest' arguing ideology vs integrity.
It was simply catering to itself, forcing its will to harm. Justifying this. For years.
This is called a hate crime. It is based on prejudice. Hence why its opinion changed later on.
But when its opinion changes, this does not alleviate it from its crime. It only enhances it.
Because it promoted that prejudice when there were ambiguities, it should have withdrawn.
That force itself, justifying itself to create harm on the mass public, knowing the devastating consequences of its actions on to my life. This is pursuit of harm, as well as on-going hate crime. That still persists to today, in its demented harassment and vanity.
So please do not be confused.
LOL. Idiots attempting to kill me. Based on what reasoning?
It's all going to backfire on you.
I never framed anyone.
You DID.
And endlessly.
Now trying to distort reality of the situation, making me into the scapegoat.
As I was only in my defense, and it is in fact,
YOUR attempting to recruit, and bring people into your motives of targeting me for harm,
that they ALL GOT IN TROUBLE BECAUSE YOU.
YOU FUCKING CUNT.
That is Elon Musk.
If not others as well in synergy.
And trying to blame the blind guy who is defending himself trying to get the authorities to verify what you did? And it is up to them the outcome?
It is by existing deeds, they are given that outcome. Not my words.
You fucking idiot.
And you will be charged for trying to kill me for that.
-----------
On Steve, hate crime + attempted murder by massivity of the ideas framed,
knowing the situation of the court, where I was already being framed by others,
stating I was a spy = capital punishment. As my death penalty was already insinuated before its revival on framing.
And further, I have come up with much needed reasoning, but I state so while retaining my innocence. I only state this to make a point on responsibility.
And that was:
Knowing the monitoring was going on in the house,
if it didn't verify its so-called 'presentations' on to me by email or towards the audience by itself, on-screen or the phone.
The accountability entirely falls on to him. That is, he is responsible for his own actions.
Meaning, nothing he has done to try framing me to try killing me, justifies.
Had the so-called ideas existed back then by him. (And no, it's just an impossible concept)
Where exactly is the fucker stating it's presented ideas?
If it said, anywhere within the house, there's literally his computer and my computer in proximity, at moment's notice. Within METERS. So seconds.
It's not a mansion where you get lost. So it is IMPOSSIBLE for it to NOT confirm.
If it says, it was presented outside of the house, that is also a lie. We never hung around outside, except this once where we walked around the neighbourhood block for 15 minutes? or less. And it is in the neighbourhood. Of course it would come to confirm as we arrive to our rooms.
I've seen a relay where it said "Steve Harvey took MJ to church." This never happened. So you can dismiss its claims of outside as well, if it said that. (There'd be witnesses if such a thing happened)
Whatever it says, the point is:
Accountability befalls on to him. And his framing, (that is massivity of ideas) and other things he has done to obliterate my life, which also includes 'beating him up', which another framing.
Alongside other character assassinations by framing. Just constantly creating stories after stories. Toying with my life because it knows I am alone, and there is no evidence to refute otherwise.
This cannot be forgiven.