And the reason why I speak out on whatever I see, even though I could be wrong on my assumption,
is my survival tactic while I am blind.
If I miss something, that is their attacks, I let it grow.
If it's a hit and miss from me, then that's fine. I guess I didn't read the relay correctly.
But I can't stay silent. I have to run every possible permutations in my mind of possibilities of attacks.
And you want to use that against me?
As you put me in this situation, being blind?
As you leave me no choice but to try and find out what is going on by speaking out constantly?
Do you see how I am completely subjugated by your preferences of reasoning?
There is just about zero fucking empathy.
And you are calling ME crazy?
Are you insane?
--------
I told Festus feel free to use my presentation as a base for an variation of his own presentation. (You can see the emails)
But I didn't realize, he would do that to MY investors. Through MY channel.
AGAINST ME.
As a competitor.
So this guy was a copycat, enhancing or improving on my ideas as a follow up.
Trying to steal my work to his credit.
Isn't this whats happened?
And he got in trouble for it.
And now he is trying to revive it?
Then he must be charged.
If that is what is happening. Ask the witnesses of the misleads as revival.
First understand that no competitor is allowed to follow up on someone else's idea.
And trying to hijack the investment.
You stand on my foundations.
And leveraging on the fact that I am blind and won't be refuting or even finding out what you are doing.
That was their initial intent. Believing I cannot defend myself.
That must be charged for and if there is pursuit of harm, all the more.
-----
When they try to mislead you using provocative entrapment.
Understand a person, only behaves in relation to what is applied on to him.
And that is not the normal state of the person.
A person who would otherwise be ok.
Is pushed into this environment and they justify the misusage of that further.
Deliberately dismissing any sort of empathy, to use to their advantage.
This is unacceptable. (I also seen a relay that saying "unacceptable" is too 'high' and it will not be effective a communication)
I say fuck off to that.
It's not the mannerism is which I choose to speak.
It is the situation, the logic behind what I ask to verify.
Analyzing and trying to judge based on how people are portraying themselves,
as communication towards the court,
that is stupidity itself. It is merely a way of communication, it does not harm anyone.
So what the hell is this person looking at?
If I am abusing someone, that behavior may count.
But my mannerism? It is not even an behavioral issue.
It is this type of witch hunts, one must dismiss.
These are idiots. Morons.
Trying to force their way into reason and use it for their benefit.
--------
Alright. I'm going to cool off a bit.
I need to pull myself together.
Can't let this situation and them, affect me.
Cover me as I find my center.
Today. Focusing on chores.