To organize by the timeline:

 

1. Emails. What exists insinutates no direct involvement from Steve.

2. Situation monitored in the house. Would result to its direct communication toward audience.

3. Exchange between themselves, the acolytes, which does not exist.
Or if said collaboration with me, no exchange of such communication.

4. Its mugging and confession without a foresight since the moment it appeared

on the channel, and to the moment of confession 300 days later.

5. Silence that followed without framing me further as I worked with Elon Musk,

and as it was aiming at defamation at the time of my sexuality.

6. So here there must have been a silence by the witnesses between the first major confession and the establishment that led to its silence in framing that followed.

7. And sudden reviving that framing, this time with Laura, who appears on the channel,
much, much earlier forward before to the attacks and from a different stance, silence as she observed.

Obviously, these so-called involvement would have been mentioned in the first major confession, if Laura existed in alignment to their story. Which also explains no foresight.

8. Constant contradictions, partial confessions, blatant baseless lies, untimely fabrications.

 

Please understand they are guilty.

 

When it doesn't respond to your questions, it is misleading.

And one should look into that excuse if it arrives.

It shouldn't make sense at the core.

 

How many times is that?

How many times are people responding to its excuses with "what the fuck" ?

I'm thinking that is overwhelming.

 

You can entirely see its character, since the beginning with its

contemplated brutality, fronting its brother for violent subjugation.

It is part of its heinous values no matter how it tries to be civil, that animistic force will be there.

 

Emma Bale's "All I want" and Ed Sheeran's "Supermarket Flowers" gets me. XD

 

This is March 1st.

Another month passed by.

 

need rest...