"Flash vs the justice league."

 

Stop fronting doubt authorities.

 

There was confession from Robert Bulmar years ago.

It would have mentioned it there and then, whatever this adaptation is.

 

Steve actually supported in no digital storage of any kind.

So if that was the topic of discussion, ideas being stored,

the thwarting and preservation of ideas from itself, would have been the topic THEN.

 

This was just after Steve confessed with the first confession by the way.

So like I am saying amongst infinite understanding of OTHER reasons.

You would know that, that first confession was the true one, that was of the entirety.

 

And Robert, whatever this is coming from him. After all this time, is but an adaptation, in an completely fabricated intent of timeline.

 

 

I hope you are keeping track of everything I am saying and organizing in a timeline,

but it's hard for me to do. You must keep things professionally and unleash up on them justice, as they repeat themselves in pure malice, grit and vanity.

I can't be the victim to all this because if you don't keep track of things...

And if there are questions then be sure I know about it, before coming to conclusion yourselves.

So why am I not in there still... Sigh...

 

Please understand that, my ideas are not FROM anyone,

but from my own FLOW state of creativity.

Based on needs for the investors, so they would invest.

 

You now know there was nothing between myself and Steve seeing from the emails,

and Festus must have helped as well. Steve had his path in an MBA, and did not participate directly in my business.

Had he, that would have been seen by the monitoring which was informed to him (as you can see in the emails) and would have been communicated to the investors themselves.

 

He is a pathological liar.

 

These are people from the bottom rung of society.

And they have no fear over repeating offense.

 

 

Authorities, if something is remaining as doubt.

That doubt remains as doubt. It doesn't go left or right.

But what should count after that, is the INTENT OF REST of what the perpetrator has done.

 

And if that doesn't count. By the untimely timing, by the fabrication, by the contradictions by support, by the confession,

you are indeed giving the perpetrator chance to create doubt and use it further.

 

But especially if you make that doubt,

that ambiguity, to be used against me.

 

Not EVERY idea can be proven innocent. There isn't answer for everything for everything.

That's life.

But there can be a bias.

And logical guess, by the approximations. And history of repeating intent.

 

And also understand that, I am in NO situation to mislead.

How can I?

 

What the hell would I know of its past?

If that fabrication over my wooden ships existed as long as the relays indicate,

then there would be some form of discussion with 3rd party, peers, and through exchange of server or attempt to patent, or try making, who knows.

And am I capable of throwing away all that possibility?

Am I capable of predicting that there would not be such a thing?
(Unless I first know I am innocent)

I would HAVE to confess, if it weren't mine.

 

Steve's untimely attempts, and contradictions from before,

alongside major confession and its differing state of stance,

and even supportive. (I think it was fighting my extended family over the sea platform idea

which was direct usage of wooden ships)

and everything else.

 

 

I keep seeing the "water stance" and "I am sailing" again.

So I will paste what I wrote in case people missed what I said:

-----------

Repeating, important:

Authorities. You cannot buy into this.

 

This is to aim for the start of the beginning, when it wasn't even INFORMED of the investors then.
(I only told him after I moved downstairs)

(and you can clearly see that in the email, saying it is an unbelievable story and unbelievable amount)

Wooden ships were almost 2 years before I moved downstairs I believe.

 

If Steve said wooden ships were "thwarted" and as an investor prospect,

and when I wasn't even talking to him then, and you can see by the emails, it is AFTER I moved downstairs i'm telling him my investor association and what is happening by the monitoring.

Then obviously, Steve is lying about the wooden ships by the timing isn't it?

(and you can clearly see that in the email, saying it is an unbelievable story and unbelievable amount)

Wooden ships were almost 2 years before I moved downstairs I believe.

 

 

So try and connect the dots. Please.

 

It is constantly lying.

 

 

CONFESS, you asshole.

 

----------

See Biden's INTENT. Supporting Steve for political motivations.

This is how I was attacked. See its contradictions from before when wooden ships were established as mine and Steve was silent or supportive.

Biden's intent for all these political aspirations and using me for his benefit,

installation suffering on to me, taking my rights and aiming devastation on to my life.

Destruction on to my life. Must be accounted for.

 

That email is following introduction to Festus and business that is in prospect.

April 28th (Festus meeting) to May 8th (Bathroom email).

So it is about during those times.

"Unbelievable story, unbelievable amount" trying to convince him of it.

If it tries to dilute as if it were from a different timeline, see the overall emails.

8 months of being aware (I first told him of the investor stuff about 2 months after I moved downstairs)

and suddenly I would say that out of the timeline? This is pertaining to what was discussed

AFTER I moved downstairs. Alongside the informing of monitoring as well that is in the emails.

As well as the people who were recognizing, the audience, noticing i've acquainted him

when I moved downstairs.

And he being aware of the situation of the monitoring during those times. I believe.

 

 

Yup, sounds like I got it right judging by the relays.

I can predict without sight, because I am innocent, that is my idea,

and I know it would lie.

It lied and you can clearly see it.

 

Now you merely have to connect to Festus' testimony on his MBA path advice,

and to the emails in timeline, and you know why that conversation came about with the bathroom.

And Steve is lying about the wooden ships.

 

Told you.

This guy is a pathological liar, and it has NO SUCH THING AS CONSCIENCE OR HONOR.

 

When that is a lie, everything else is as well. Since that is the start of my dealing with Adam.

And you know whats happened in the house.

Alongside its support towards me against Robert Bulmar on no digital storage device

and its non-speak out then as an absolutely must discussion if there was thwarting and something was preserved as information.

Alongside its then confession just prior to it.

 

 

I hope everything is coming together in your minds.

 

That is a socio-psychopath, a pathological liar.

 

 

And again, if it knew it was being monitored, and communication towards investors was possible, and that it knew my communication by email,

then it would simply state it there and then as his.

 

So IF Steve said it was "thwarted" by me, by any investor prospect, when the wooden ships
were nearly 2 years before I moved downstairs, or something like that.

As AFTER downstairs was when I told him of the investor association,

and Steve probably agreed to this (that I told him investor association after I moved downstairs) at some point.

 

Then you know it is lying.

 

 

"Flash vs justice league."

You can easily get confused.

So think on it.

 

Stop fronting doubt.

Keep to commonsense.

That is probability.

 

You just found another evidence.

But you choose to refute it, for what?

After all the repeating offense?

 

How would I know it would be lying?

I'm blind.

 

When you see the intent,

you can predict how it will never be consistent as it lies.

Lies are never consistent.

And you just found a lie.

 

 

You were fucked Steve.

But you are fucked even more now.

 

 

 

----------

Alright, apologies to the authorities for gloating.

I have some rights in that after all the suffering I endured because of this fucker.

 

 

Elon Musk is lying if that is about the spherical ship.

Mr Gates, please speak out.

Witnesses then in my list please speak out.

Steve's first confession followed after my spherical ship as well.

 

They are lying.

Targeting someone in isolation.

 

Witnesses help out.

 

 

 

 

Witnesses should speak out on anything they observed.

 

 

And witnesses. Can you please try and remember and help out?

Whatever Steve's contradictions. And Robert Bulmar as well.

 

Let's end this cycle of madness.

These people are unacceptable.